Captains need to change
#1
Posted 18 March 2013 - 02:22 PM
i like pominville as a player but it was a huge mistake making him captain. these teams have lacked just about everything you want since he was given the C. he certainly has done nothing to keep the team from going into their pathetic tailspin
stafford as an A i even worse. im not a stafford hater but its obvious he is never going to make anybody else do a damned thing. he cant even play up to his contract as it is. hes done exactly one impressive thing in his career, and thats time a period of stellar play perfectly with his contract expiration status. if he wasnt paid so much id like him as a role player, but no matter what he doesnt deserve to be an assistant captain
vanek as an A isnt bad but he should never be captain imo. he has matured dramatically since he came to the majors, you may recall he was a massively immature train wreck of a talent for quite a while. now at least he usually says the right things, but i just dont see him being a main on/off ice leader either. under a strong captain hed be ok but even with his current level of maturity i dont think he would ever be captain material
idk who else they could possibly give it to but they really need to strip the first two and just let them be role players if they are going to stay on the team
#2
Posted 18 March 2013 - 02:36 PM
Pominville on the other hand is almost invisible in his role as Captain. He almost always disappears when there's any trouble on the ice. This is a soft team built by Darcy regier and coached Appropriately soft by Lindy Ruff and now by Ruffton so I suppose he's a perfect fit For a Lindy Darcy team.
#3
Posted 18 March 2013 - 02:51 PM
Edited by Grumpy, 18 March 2013 - 05:21 PM.
#4
Posted 19 March 2013 - 12:17 AM
If that's even allowed.
#5
Posted 19 March 2013 - 08:36 AM
#6
Posted 19 March 2013 - 08:59 AM
#7
Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:06 AM
http://sports.yahoo....hl/players/1600
#8
Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:11 AM
#9
Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:57 AM
#11
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:22 AM
CallawaySabres, on 19 March 2013 - 09:06 AM, said:
http://sports.yahoo....hl/players/1600
So, we want the captain of a team that perennially disappoints and under performs in the playoffs to key our culture change?
On the bright side, Taro would have one hell of an entertaining rant if we ever parted with significant pieces to acquire Thornton
#12
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:26 AM
TrueBluePhD, on 19 March 2013 - 10:22 AM, said:
On the bright side, Taro would have one hell of an entertaining rant if we ever parted with significant pieces to acquire Thornton
I don't see many significant pieces on this team right now. They need someone for 2-3 years until Hodgson is ready to take over....
#14
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:43 AM
#16
Posted 19 March 2013 - 12:24 PM
Meathead, on 18 March 2013 - 02:22 PM, said:
idk who else they could possibly give it to
Shouldn't change captains without first establishing who'd be a better captain.
In 14 replying posts, the only Sabre names that came up were Hodgson, Foligno, Ott, Weber, Kaleta, and Scott. I'm not convinced.
Maybe Hodgson in a few years. Ott has the heart and the work ethic and is probably great in the locker room, but at game time, his forte is talking at the other team, not leading his own team.
Edited by IKnowPhysics, 19 March 2013 - 12:47 PM.
#17
Posted 19 March 2013 - 12:25 PM
IKnowPhysics, on 19 March 2013 - 12:24 PM, said:
In 14 replying posts, the only Sabre names that came up were Hodgson, Foligno, Ott, Weber, Kaleta, and Scott. I'm not convinced.
Maybe Hodgson in a few years. Ott has the heart and the work ethic and is probably great in the locker room, but at game time, his forte is talking at the other team, not leading his own team.
This.
#18
Posted 19 March 2013 - 12:41 PM
IKnowPhysics, on 19 March 2013 - 12:24 PM, said:
In 14 replying posts, the only Sabre names that came up were Hodgson, Foligno, Ott, Weber, Kaleta, and Scott. I'm not convinced.
Maybe Hodgson in a few years. Ott has the heart and the work ethic and is probably great in the locker room, but at game time, his forte is talking at the other team, not leading his own team.
In addition to this, shouldn't change captains without having a permanent coach in place and having some semblance of an idea of which players are in the team's long term plans.
#19
Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:48 PM
#20
Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:54 PM
#21
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:58 PM
IKnowPhysics, on 19 March 2013 - 12:24 PM, said:
Shouldn't change captains without first establishing who'd be a better captain.
In 14 replying posts, the only Sabre names that came up were Hodgson, Foligno, Ott, Weber, Kaleta, and Scott. I'm not convinced.
Maybe Hodgson in a few years. Ott has the heart and the work ethic and is probably great in the locker room, but at game time, his forte is talking at the other team, not leading his own team.
Two goals tonight might dispute your view.
Meathead, on 19 March 2013 - 09:54 PM, said:
I think it would be a bit nasty and an affront to Pommer to take the C away. Staf, on the other hand, never really deserved it and hasn't done anything to keep it. I say take the A away from him and give it to Ott.
#22
Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:51 PM
Meathead, on 19 March 2013 - 09:54 PM, said:
Easy. Trade 'em both. Get a center or two back in return. Big Joe wouldn't be terrible. He'd certainly help the anemic power play and would be a nice center for Vanek. He has a few years left in him and hopefully in a few years Grigo will be ready for prime time.
#23
Posted 20 March 2013 - 02:03 AM
IKnowPhysics, on 19 March 2013 - 12:24 PM, said:
In 14 replying posts, the only Sabre names that came up were Hodgson, Foligno, Ott, Weber, Kaleta, and Scott. I'm not convinced.
Maybe Hodgson in a few years. Ott has the heart and the work ethic and is probably great in the locker room, but at game time, his forte is talking at the other team, not leading his own team.
It's been so long since the Sabres have had a team with a killer instinct. I've had enough of it and I want our captain to embody those traits.
#24
Posted 20 March 2013 - 03:52 AM
qwksndmonster, on 20 March 2013 - 02:03 AM, said:
It's been so long since the Sabres have had a team with a killer instinct. I've had enough of it and I want our captain to embody those traits.
I've never been a fan of giving the C to a player that is so new to the team, but I think Ott would be the kind of captain this team needs desperately. As far as upsetting Pommers by stripping him of the C, who cares, what's he gonna do, play softer or give less of an effort ? I would rather see Gerbe wear the C, (from the pressbox) than Pommers right about now.
#25
Posted 20 March 2013 - 05:57 AM
Grumpy, on 18 March 2013 - 02:51 PM, said:
There will be no change at GM anytime soon. New contract extension combined with ownerships firm belief in Regier is a given.
With that said, I do agree with you in that changing the Captain is a moot point.
Changing the roster is where results will be seen with this team IMHO.
#27
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:29 AM
HopefulFuture, on 20 March 2013 - 05:57 AM, said:
With that said, I do agree with you in that changing the Captain is a moot point.
Changing the roster is where results will be seen with this team IMHO.
Edited by Grumpy, 20 March 2013 - 07:30 AM.
#28
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:37 AM
Who Else?, on 19 March 2013 - 09:11 AM, said:
bills_fan_in_raleigh, on 20 March 2013 - 06:50 AM, said:
#29
Posted 20 March 2013 - 08:06 AM
Attached Files
#32
Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:04 AM
“We’ve actually been telling Patty to grow up for years. He brings his Legos on the road,” said a laughing captain Jason Pominville, referring to Kaleta’s elaborate hobby collection.
http://www.buffalone.../130319055/1004
#33
Posted 20 March 2013 - 11:57 AM
#35
Posted 20 March 2013 - 01:17 PM
IKnowPhysics, on 20 March 2013 - 01:01 PM, said:
very, very nice. i don't know that movie as well as i should. i guess it illustrates my point to contrast newman's character's reaction with pominville's remark. or not.
in all events, the problem lies not with the hansons or with kaleta.
#36
Posted 20 March 2013 - 01:44 PM
#38
Posted 20 March 2013 - 02:19 PM













