Our Dear Friend Darcy
#1
Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:19 PM
#2
Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:32 PM
I actually left the game with more than 7 minutes left tonight. New record for me.
#3
Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:39 PM
#4
Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:40 PM
Edited by bunomatic, 23 February 2013 - 10:56 PM.
#5
Posted 24 February 2013 - 12:13 AM
Hire a consultant to be interim GM.
Hire the best available GM Candidate during the off season, allow him to pick the coach.
Start the rebuild in June.
#6
Posted 24 February 2013 - 12:50 AM
#7
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:45 AM
Edited by neverenough, 24 February 2013 - 02:47 AM.
#8
Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:25 AM
unfortunately, we can't go back in time, so he should be gone immediately.
#9
Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:50 AM
#10
Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:52 AM
sicknfla, on 24 February 2013 - 07:50 AM, said:
I wouldn't mind him if it weren't for his political/ gay rights activism. I want a GM who solely deals with hockey.
#11
Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:56 AM
#12
Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:58 AM
#13
Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:58 AM
sicknfla, on 24 February 2013 - 07:50 AM, said:
Again, he just makes goonish teams. He was the GM for 5 years in Toronto and never made the playoffs - with no money issues. He has also drafted appallingly (ask the Leaf fans). He is a character and outspoken - the very opposite of Regier, but I don't think he is right for the job. Also, he has just taken another job in Anaheim, I doubt he quits that for at least a year.
An assistant GM would be our best chance I think.
Also I was thinking, how about as Regier's swan song he offer sheets ROR for us, accepts the other GMs will hate him but knows he is leaving in the summer and it is his final present to this club. That and getting 2 more firsts for this draft.
#14
Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:00 AM
#15
Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:01 AM
If they win 1 playoff series my salary is $500K
2 series $1million
Get to the Cup $2 million
Win the Cup...$5 million
That would be 6 free years of service if my name was Darcy.
Ted Black.....give me a call........maybe you could put up with my "negativity bubble" now?????????
#16
Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:12 AM
Ghost of Dwight Drane, on 24 February 2013 - 08:01 AM, said:
If they win 1 playoff series my salary is $500K
2 series $1million
Get to the Cup $2 million
Win the Cup...$5 million
That would be 6 free years of service if my name was Darcy.
Ted Black.....give me a call........maybe you could put up with my "negativity bubble" now?????????
With that math it is obvious you should go nowhere near salary cap issues.
#17
Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:45 AM
The only way we're going to get any kind of reasonable deal done anytime in the short-term is if some potential trade partner invents some kind of cap manipulation tactic that makes it plausible to offer us value. MAYBE he can use the trade deadline as some type of leverage if a potential Cup winner thinks we (!?) have the last missing part they need, but other than I think we're stuck unless TP is in complete "fire sale" mode.
#18
Posted 24 February 2013 - 08:54 AM
And last night Stafford was MINUS 2 against the 22nd worst team in the NHL - this line made a bottom 10 team look like Stanley Cup timber.
#19
Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:07 AM
Jsixspd, on 24 February 2013 - 08:54 AM, said:
And last night Stafford was MINUS 2 against the 22nd worst team in the NHL - this line made a bottom 10 team look like Stanley Cup timber.
I have said for 3 years Staphyl (a bacteria) needs to go. He is an infection that only hurts the team. The guy only skates when his ass is on fire and right now he is having a hard time turning it on because he is getting older. I can finally see an effort, but really. Apparently his disease has spread to Pominville. Time to dump both or at least put them on waivers and see if someone claims them if no trade is imminent. Stafford's best value was at the end of last year, yet Darcy did nothing...
Edited by North Buffalo, 24 February 2013 - 09:08 AM.
#20
Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:12 AM
North Buffalo, on 24 February 2013 - 09:07 AM, said:
I agree. Staff is of no use. He's turned into a young Hecht.
#21
Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:12 AM
North Buffalo, on 24 February 2013 - 09:07 AM, said:
I'm so glad you are not our GM. You don't just dump players onto waivers when they have trade value, no matter how little
#22
Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:18 AM
ThirtyEight, on 24 February 2013 - 09:12 AM, said:
In Stafford's case and at this point, if you cannot trade him, he makes the team worse and hurts the development of younger players, so normally I would agree, but in his case, I take issue with you kind genteman. P.S. I worked on Capitol Hill for 15 years and say what you want about politics but the problems are not the result of people not putting in effort. In fact they go at it so hard, they forget what they are actually trying to accomplish. This attitude can't be said for the chumps and slackers playing for the Sabres.
P.S. My biggest frustration is for someone who says through words or deeds that "it is not my job." And where I have worked that would get you fired on the spot...
Edited by North Buffalo, 24 February 2013 - 09:22 AM.
#23
Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:18 AM
This team sucks and the biggest thing is no heart. No heart, no talent, no accountability, or a little of all three. Players that get paid way too much to be this fragile. And no evident plan by management/ownership to fix it. We're a country club now and maybe that's part of the problem.
What a mess.
#24
Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:19 AM
mrm33064, on 24 February 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:
It does make you wonder how many deals that would have been at least fair and would have bettered the team that he has missed. Yeah, his strategy got him what he wanted in one trade, but what's the net result of continued application of the same policy?
Also, Ted Black was on WGR and said something along the lines of "last year, the big issue was center depth, and now we have Hodgson, Grigorenko and Girgensons." Problem is that center depth wasn't pointed out last year; it was pointed out in the summer of 2007. Darcy failed to address it for five years. Of course, they would say that he didn't the resources, but how did he get those players? Drafting and trading prospects/picks. Resources did not limit him from making similar moves pre-TPegs. Plus, they're all so young that not one of them has actually proven that he is an NHL scoring-line center yet. Hodgson is the closest offensively, but has a long way to go defensively to count. We won't know if he actually addressed the problem until at least next season. That's six seasons of not fixing one of the biggest holes in the roster that a team can have.
Edited by carpandean, 24 February 2013 - 09:20 AM.
#25
Posted 24 February 2013 - 09:35 AM
-Barnaby for Barnes
-Warrener for Drury
-Gratton for Briere
So in 15 years he made 3 real difference making trades. What else is there? Any particularly great draft picks? I guess Pominville at #55 is ok.
I'm not going document the case against him because it's been done to death. I'm just trying to figure out the argument for him?
#26
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:35 AM
#27
Posted 24 February 2013 - 12:09 PM
thewookie1, on 24 February 2013 - 07:52 AM, said:
Oh, man. Are you serious. Good grief!!
cgang, on 24 February 2013 - 09:18 AM, said:
What?
=====
I think his days are really numbered now.
I hope the Sabres have someone in mind and he is in place soon enough to properly handle the trade deadline. Failing that, then the draft and free-agency.
#28
Posted 24 February 2013 - 12:16 PM
ThirtyEight, on 24 February 2013 - 07:58 AM, said:
An assistant GM would be our best chance I think.
Also I was thinking, how about as Regier's swan song he offer sheets ROR for us, accepts the other GMs will hate him but knows he is leaving in the summer and it is his final present to this club. That and getting 2 more firsts for this draft.
Haven't read the rest of this thread so I apologize if it has already been stated, but Vancouver, Anaheim and Toronto are better because of his work there. You can pick apart his successes and his relative input at these three places but just as the Sabres are who there record says they are, so too are these franchises and Burke played a major role in it all.
#29
Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:34 PM
An inexperienced GM brings in an inexperienced coach. Not a good recipe for success. Now if an experienced GM were to hire an inexperienced coach then you would be a little more confident.
#30
Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:42 PM
#31
Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:46 PM
bunomatic, on 24 February 2013 - 01:42 PM, said:
Presuming we are not promoting Enroth to GM, I think the new GM will be fine and so it would be fine to upgrade an assistant GM around the league to our GM
#32
Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:50 PM
#33
Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:53 PM
ThirtyEight, on 24 February 2013 - 01:46 PM, said:
Presuming we are not promoting Enroth to GM, I think the new GM will be fine and so it would be fine to upgrade an assistant GM around the league to our GM
Right, someone hungry but with experience. And someone who is not afraid to have their own assistant GM.
sicknfla, on 24 February 2013 - 01:50 PM, said:
There is a difference between an assistant -to- the GM and an assistant GM.
#35
Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:55 PM
sizzlemeister, on 24 February 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:
Right, someone hungry but with experience. And someone who is not afraid to have their own assistant GM.
There is a difference between an assistant -to- the GM and an assistant GM.
Not in my book. I want nothing to do with someone coming here who's previous job title was ass.
Edited by sicknfla, 24 February 2013 - 02:01 PM.
#36
Posted 24 February 2013 - 03:11 PM
tom webster, on 24 February 2013 - 12:16 PM, said:
I humbly agree, and if anyone here expects a new GM to turn this travesty around in one or two years, you are extremely naive or sadly mistaken Toronto is better than us.. I hope to hell I'm wrong and I hope you all can throw this in my face someday. I'll gladly eat crow, but I don't expect to.
Edited by Grumpy, 24 February 2013 - 03:17 PM.
#37
Posted 24 February 2013 - 03:29 PM
#38
Posted 24 February 2013 - 03:35 PM
WildCard, on 24 February 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:
Nice screen name, BTW. ("Wildcard, ######!")
#39
Posted 24 February 2013 - 03:54 PM
Robviously, on 24 February 2013 - 03:35 PM, said:
Jim Nill. He sounds pretty good based on that (small) write-up. I also like the sound of the Toronto guy they mentioned (Claude Loiselle). Basically I want someone smart from outside the organization who has a vision and the guts to make it a reality. This should be a desirable job given the market and the owner.
Nice screen name, BTW. ("Wildcard, ######!")
#40
Posted 24 February 2013 - 06:10 PM
North Buffalo, on 24 February 2013 - 09:07 AM, said:
Same here.
I suppose we should be happy he seems to care now, but I rather just feel angered he didn't care earlier.
Stafford's been on my "dump 'em" list for years, as a close runner-up to Derek Roy.












