New Coach Fever
#1
Posted 21 February 2013 - 05:57 PM
Trade Vanek? Geez.
These are the kinds of ideas that come out of the woodwork when you stay with a coach 8 years too long.
#2
Posted 21 February 2013 - 06:03 PM
#3
Posted 21 February 2013 - 06:22 PM
#4
Posted 21 February 2013 - 08:57 PM
Good bye Darcy, Good bye Darcy, Good bye Darcy, the fat lady's singing your tune.
#5
Posted 21 February 2013 - 11:17 PM
JHeinz4727, on 21 February 2013 - 08:57 PM, said:
Good bye Darcy, Good bye Darcy, Good bye Darcy, the fat lady's singing your tune.
#6
Posted 21 February 2013 - 11:33 PM
PTR
#7
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:59 AM
#8
Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:39 AM
#9
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:20 AM
I agree that they didn't look any different last night and it's frustrating to watch, but did we all really think this team would suddenly change overnight just because the coach is new? Did anyone think that maybe Rolston wants a game or two to evaluate how he should run things? He just joined the team on Wednesday afternoon and barely has had any time to talk to the players, much less coach them. Let's give the guy a chance before we fire him, too.
#10
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:38 AM
#11
Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:12 AM
#12
Posted 22 February 2013 - 10:07 AM
Buffalo Wings, on 22 February 2013 - 08:20 AM, said:
I agree that they didn't look any different last night and it's frustrating to watch, but did we all really think this team would suddenly change overnight just because the coach is new? Did anyone think that maybe Rolston wants a game or two to evaluate how he should run things? He just joined the team on Wednesday afternoon and barely has had any time to talk to the players, much less coach them. Let's give the guy a chance before we fire him, too.
This. I can't believe people actually thought changing the coach would miraculously make this team turn it around and go lossless. Firing the coach is just the first step in righting this ship.
#13
Posted 22 February 2013 - 10:14 AM
bunomatic, on 22 February 2013 - 10:07 AM, said:
I doubt anyone thought that.
I didn't see the game last night, but from what I've read the usual lack luster effort for a good chunk of the game was evident. If so, that is especially disturbing given the regime change that occurred 24hrs prior. If that didn't result in a significant increase (if only temporary) in on ice energy, I cannot imagine what would.
#14
Posted 22 February 2013 - 11:38 AM
Sabre Dance, on 22 February 2013 - 09:12 AM, said:
Yeah, part of it is conditioning. Part of it is executing the new plan versus slipping back into old habits. I think there were flashes of what a RR-coached team will play like, and I liked it. There was also too much of the old ways. Blecch.
#15
Posted 22 February 2013 - 12:09 PM
#17
Posted 22 February 2013 - 12:14 PM
Doohickie, on 22 February 2013 - 11:38 AM, said:
The fact that this team didn't come out and look any different should put to rest the idea that the team stopped playing for Ruff and shut him out hoping to get rid of him. These guys know how to play hockey and have been doing it for a huge part of their lives, they don't need a coach to teach them a system/scheme to make them play better
Eleven, on 22 February 2013 - 12:11 PM, said:
#18
Posted 22 February 2013 - 01:34 PM
weave, on 22 February 2013 - 10:14 AM, said:
I didn't see the game last night, but from what I've read the usual lack luster effort for a good chunk of the game was evident. If so, that is especially disturbing given the regime change that occurred 24hrs prior. If that didn't result in a significant increase (if only temporary) in on ice energy, I cannot imagine what would.
About the only reason the lackluster play would disappear is because the players would think they're playing for their jobs. Maybe they don't fear that - or ever will, for that matter - because they have contracts with guaranteed money and agents and a union....or whatever.
Coaching changes in mid-season have worked for some teams in the past (it got them to the playoffs, at least), so maybe we'll see something over the course of the next 2 months. To be honest, I don't know what to expect...but I certainly didn't expect a miraculous turnaround in the first game.
apuszczalowski, on 22 February 2013 - 12:14 PM, said:
This happens everywhere...even in "the real world". I've seen plenty of people in my career cover things up, point blame at another group, or (worse yet) blame someone who recently left the company so that they wouldn't look bad.
#20
Posted 22 February 2013 - 03:02 PM
Buffalo Wings, on 22 February 2013 - 08:20 AM, said:
I agree that they didn't look any different last night and it's frustrating to watch, but did we all really think this team would suddenly change overnight just because the coach is new? Did anyone think that maybe Rolston wants a game or two to evaluate how he should run things? He just joined the team on Wednesday afternoon and barely has had any time to talk to the players, much less coach them. Let's give the guy a chance before we fire him, too.
Not speaking for anybody else, I certainly expected them to receive the wake-up call.
A player's skillset is his skillset, but the one thing he can control and improve upon on a night-to-night basis is his hustle, jam, whatever you want to call it. I expected them to play hard, and while I won't say they mailed it in, they sure didn't respond to the opportunity to show their new (interim) coach what they have and how they can contribute.
Hopefully Rolston can reach them, but as much as I hate to say it, I think the complacency and comfort of the players in the dressing room may now be endemic and blowing up the roster might not be the worst thing to happen to this club.
I really hope they (the players) prove me wrong on that point.
#22
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:11 PM
#23
Posted 23 February 2013 - 01:41 AM
#24
Posted 23 February 2013 - 02:58 AM
#25
Posted 23 February 2013 - 03:08 AM
JHeinz4727, on 21 February 2013 - 08:57 PM, said:
Good bye Darcy, Good bye Darcy, Good bye Darcy, the fat lady's singing your tune.
seriously?
the guy had the job for HOURS.
what the H.E.Double hockey sticks is wrong with you people? did you really think the team was going to be this amazing beast without even one practice with the new coach?
#26
Posted 23 February 2013 - 05:17 AM
JHeinz4727, on 21 February 2013 - 08:57 PM, said:
Good bye Darcy, Good bye Darcy, Good bye Darcy, the fat lady's singing your tune.
I think the biggest asset of any coach and his staff is teaching, just about everything a professional athlete does has been taught to him, and they can continue to learn. You can definitely teach someone to skate faster, or shoot straighter or whatever, that's probably a lot more on the staff and trainers than the head coach, but still players can be taught to improve in those areas. As far as toughness on the puck, a lot of that comes down to desire, if a player really believes in the "system" and feels like he's part of it and also respected/ appreciated, he's gonna try harder. I know for myself, any job I ever had, if the boss/owner treated me good and I liked what I was doing, I tried much harder than someplace where I felt unappreciated or disrespected.
Good coaches make average players better, not good players average.
#27
Posted 23 February 2013 - 08:46 AM
Buffalo Wings, on 22 February 2013 - 01:34 PM, said:
Coaching changes in mid-season have worked for some teams in the past (it got them to the playoffs, at least), so maybe we'll see something over the course of the next 2 months. To be honest, I don't know what to expect...but I certainly didn't expect a miraculous turnaround in the first game.
This happens everywhere...even in "the real world". I've seen plenty of people in my career cover things up, point blame at another group, or (worse yet) blame someone who recently left the company so that they wouldn't look bad.
The examples I've heard on the radio station that shall not be named had rosters with much more high end talent.
#28
Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:15 AM
apuszczalowski, on 22 February 2013 - 12:14 PM, said:
I don't think Darcy will have the chance. Fans and management (I think) are locked in on him. If RR fails, its not his system but the chess pieces. All DR.
#29
Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:21 AM
Patty16, on 23 February 2013 - 08:46 AM, said:
Touche. Sometimes the right coach with the right players can make things work, however. I'm not saying that will be the case here, but there's enough talent on this team for them to be winning much more often than they are.
#30
Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:27 AM
Buffalo Wings, on 23 February 2013 - 10:21 AM, said:
To this I agree. How much more I'm not sure. I just don't see this team as a sleeping giant waiting to be awakened by the professorial Rolston a la Pitt, LA, or NJD.
#31
Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:12 AM
Patty16, on 23 February 2013 - 10:27 AM, said:
I dunno, LA really shouldn't be considered elite. They won the cup because they got hot at the right time. But 2 seasons ago they were 7th, last season they were 8th and currently they are 11th. They are not an amazing team in my eyes. Similarly NJD don't really have much elite talent - they have Kovalchuck and they used to have Parise (Brodeur is too old to be a force anymore)












