Interesting thought (E1)
#1
Posted 16 February 2013 - 06:06 AM
I would love Iginla...... maybe 4 years ago. I don't want us spending tons of players on a rental player.
Evander Kane, that is an interesting notion seeing as that would give us that ever important 2nd or 3rd power forward along with the fact that Kane has actually had some problems with Winnipeg in general.
#2
Posted 16 February 2013 - 06:15 AM
#3
Posted 16 February 2013 - 06:43 AM
I have never been a Eklund fan, and nor am I one now. But, in recent months, he has been given credit by a number of reporters for being the first to report a trade or a news idea and wasnt he the first to announce the lockout was over?
#4
Posted 16 February 2013 - 06:52 AM
Vanek-Man, on 16 February 2013 - 06:43 AM, said:
I have never been a Eklund fan, and nor am I one now. But, in recent months, he has been given credit by a number of reporters for being the first to report a trade or a news idea and wasnt he the first to announce the lockout was over?
He had a brief stint of being useful, around the end of the 04 lockout, and has basically done nothing since. Someone used to track how often he was right, last i saw it was around 3%
On the other hand, maybe he is in the know the most and trade talks just fall through frequently anyway. Did he definitely say they lost the night before? Nash and Col also played the night before
#5
Posted 16 February 2013 - 06:58 AM
thewookie1, on 16 February 2013 - 06:06 AM, said:
I would love Iginla...... maybe 4 years ago. I don't want us spending tons of players on a rental player.
Evander Kane, that is an interesting notion seeing as that would give us that ever important 2nd or 3rd power forward along with the fact that Kane has actually had some problems with Winnipeg in general.
Under that premise a move for a player like Iginla makes a lot of sense. Veteran player that has been through the wars that could give the lineup a injection of talent and give Lindy some real versatility with the lineup. What has to be weighed is the cost for Iginla compared to the reward of the playoffs. IMO, Iginla would do more for the Sabres playoff chances than say Ryan O'Reilly. Considering Iginla is a rental, I wouldn't be willing to give similar compensation.
#6
Posted 16 February 2013 - 07:00 AM
ThirtyEight, on 16 February 2013 - 06:52 AM, said:
On the other hand, maybe he is in the know the most and trade talks just fall through frequently anyway. Did he definitely say they lost the night before? Nash and Col also played the night before
Yeah, Darcy said the struggling team "lost last night". Only leaves Coyotes and Minnesota. And honestly, it could see both of them try to get rid of some payroll soon. Coyotes because they're broke, and Minnesota just spend $200 million on two dudes, if they don't see this team getting anywhere this season, i could see them try to save a few bucks.
#7
Posted 16 February 2013 - 07:01 AM
#8
Posted 16 February 2013 - 08:35 AM
#9
Posted 16 February 2013 - 08:47 AM
Spndnchz, on 16 February 2013 - 08:35 AM, said:
For someone who infamously starts slow he has 9 points in 12 games. He also only has 1 goal - but I would expect that to increase, as he has 11 30 goal seasons. He is a power forward type player, they start dropping around his level. He might no longer be elite, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be a lethal 60-70 point player who can lead a team
#10
Posted 16 February 2013 - 12:26 PM
#12
Posted 16 February 2013 - 12:48 PM
#14
Posted 16 February 2013 - 02:32 PM
Edited by qwksndmonster, 16 February 2013 - 02:33 PM.
#15
Posted 16 February 2013 - 02:50 PM
#16
Posted 16 February 2013 - 02:58 PM
Vanek-Man, on 16 February 2013 - 06:43 AM, said:
I have never been a Eklund fan, and nor am I one now. But, in recent months, he has been given credit by a number of reporters for being the first to report a trade or a news idea and wasnt he the first to announce the lockout was over?
I noticed this as well. Can't remember specifics off the top of my head, but I know at least a handful of times over the past calendar year I've seen actual, legitimate hockey people tweet things like "Gotta give credit where credit is due" and cite HockeyBuzz. I don't take his word as gospel, but believe it or not I think he's slightly more reliable than he was maybe 2-3 years ago.
thewookie1, on 16 February 2013 - 06:06 AM, said:
I would love Iginla...... maybe 4 years ago. I don't want us spending tons of players on a rental player.
Evander Kane, that is an interesting notion seeing as that would give us that ever important 2nd or 3rd power forward along with the fact that Kane has actually had some problems with Winnipeg in general.
Being a rental player actually plays in our favor. We will be able to get him considerably cheaper, and more importantly won't have to deal with his twilight years if he is, in fact, a "shell of his former self who cannot lead by example anymore." Of course, this only matters if the Sabres begin to look like a playoff contender once again, otherwise it would all be for naught. The article mentioned they'd be interested in Enroth, which makes sense, but I'm not sure how much more I would give. Paul Gaustad fetched a first round pick at last year's trade deadline -- I'm not going near that price this early in an already-shortened season, especially if the deal was made at the April 3rd Trade Deadline. Can you imagine if we traded a first round pick (or more!) for Iginla to play 11 games and miss the playoffs?
Normally I'm not one to propose the silly "our garbage for your best player" deals, but I honestly would not do much more than Enroth, Luke Adam, another mid-level prospect and maybe throw in a 3rd round pick. I don't think Calgary has any leverage, really -- they owe it to Iginla to give him a shot to win a cup elsewhere, and he will have a say in where he goes since he has a NMC. Perhaps Iginla chooses Buffalo because of his good buddy Robyn? If so, there's not too much Calgary can do other than accept our best offer.
Vanek-Man, on 16 February 2013 - 07:00 AM, said:
As for the Coyotes thing (I don't believe it would be the Wild, and Eklund specifically mentioned Phoenix so there you go...): I'm thinking Derek Morris. A nice stay-at-home style d-man with a little physicality.
#17
Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:06 PM
thesportsbuff, on 16 February 2013 - 02:58 PM, said:
Being a rental player actually plays in our favor. We will be able to get him considerably cheaper, and more importantly won't have to deal with his twilight years if he is, in fact, a "shell of his former self who cannot lead by example anymore." Of course, this only matters if the Sabres begin to look like a playoff contender once again, otherwise it would all be for naught. The article mentioned they'd be interested in Enroth, which makes sense, but I'm not sure how much more I would give. Paul Gaustad fetched a first round pick at last year's trade deadline -- I'm not going near that price this early in an already-shortened season, especially if the deal was made at the April 3rd Trade Deadline. Can you imagine if we traded a first round pick (or more!) for Iginla to play 11 games and miss the playoffs?
Normally I'm not one to propose the silly "our garbage for your best player" deals, but I honestly would not do much more than Enroth, Luke Adam, another mid-level prospect and maybe throw in a 3rd round pick. I don't think Calgary has any leverage, really -- they owe it to Iginla to give him a shot to win a cup elsewhere, and he will have a say in where he goes since he has a NMC. Perhaps Iginla chooses Buffalo because of his good buddy Robyn? If so, there's not too much Calgary can do other than accept our best offer.
As for the Coyotes thing (I don't believe it would be the Wild, and Eklund specifically mentioned Phoenix so there you go...): I'm thinking Derek Morris. A nice stay-at-home style d-man with a little physicality.
Martin Hanzal.
I think I just gave Drane and Deluca a warm and fuzzy feeling.
#18
Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:17 PM
tom webster, on 16 February 2013 - 03:06 PM, said:
I think I just gave Drane and Deluca a warm and fuzzy feeling.
Not opposed to him, but I believe the original rumor (at least the HockeyBuzz incarnation of it) said they were talking about a D-man; so Morris immediately came to mind. To open it up to forwards, there's quite a few guys I'd like. Hanzal, Vermette, Doan (if we buy out Leino following the season), Vrbata...
I doubt Doan will be moved but with ownership STILL up in the air, maybe he'll decide he's had enough and ask them to trade him.
Edited by thesportsbuff, 16 February 2013 - 03:18 PM.
#19
Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:55 PM
tom webster, on 16 February 2013 - 03:06 PM, said:
I think I just gave Drane and Deluca a warm and fuzzy feeling.
Me too and probably most Sabre fans.
thesportsbuff, on 16 February 2013 - 03:17 PM, said:
I doubt Doan will be moved but with ownership STILL up in the air, maybe he'll decide he's had enough and ask them to trade him.
I can't believe we are discussing an Ek rumour, but what if the D-Man was going from Buffalo to ?????. Did this clown say the D-Man was going to Buffalo?
#20
Posted 16 February 2013 - 04:04 PM
#21
Posted 16 February 2013 - 04:12 PM
gregkash, on 16 February 2013 - 04:04 PM, said:
Craig Button and Darryl Sutter weren't exactly model GMs and Jay Feaster is probably the worst of the three.
#22
Posted 16 February 2013 - 04:30 PM
Sabres Fan In NS, on 16 February 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:
"The Sabres, according to my sources, are also heavily interested in Winnipeg Jet, Evander Kane and have looked into possibly doing a deal with Phoenix for a D-man as well...." - HB.
I interpret that as Buffalo being the ones adding a defenseman, but I suppose he could have meant the reverse (just expressed it poorly).
#23
Posted 16 February 2013 - 04:44 PM
#24
Posted 16 February 2013 - 05:52 PM
Edited by Grumpy, 16 February 2013 - 05:53 PM.












