Edited by 716, 10 February 2013 - 11:49 AM.
Commander Cody
#1
Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:48 AM
#2
Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:51 AM
#3
Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:54 AM
#4
Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:58 AM
But in the context of being a 22-year-old sophomore being asked to function as a first-line centre, he is doing very well.
This is a guy who wants to be great and will do what it takes to get there.
#5
Posted 10 February 2013 - 12:07 PM
#6
Posted 10 February 2013 - 12:11 PM
#7
Posted 10 February 2013 - 01:47 PM
#8
Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:02 PM
Seriously though, Ennis' puck control is better than Hodgson's (and giveaway stats reflect this), and that's something you want with your best guys in a puck control situation like a powerplay.
#9
Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:09 PM
IKnowPhysics, on 10 February 2013 - 02:02 PM, said:
Seriously though, Ennis' puck control is better than Hodgson's (and giveaway stats reflect this), and that's something you want with your best guys in a puck control situation like a powerplay.
I think i'd take better faceoffs and chemistry over puck control personally. But an argument could be made either way
#10
Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:49 PM
ThirtyEight, on 10 February 2013 - 02:09 PM, said:
I think i'd take better faceoffs and chemistry over puck control personally. But an argument could be made either way
I'd agree with this.
Hodgson is 43% on FO, and Ennis 40%, so there isn't a huge difference there. Maybe put Ott back on the top PP?
#11
Posted 10 February 2013 - 03:08 PM
ThirtyEight, on 10 February 2013 - 02:09 PM, said:
I recognize the value of this; 43.3% vs 40.4% isn't exactly the hard sell.
Neither has scored on the powerplay; Ennis has three powerplay assists to Hodgon's zero. Seeing as we've only scored seven powerplay goals, that might imply that he's been handy in creating the few opportunities we've been able to capitalize on. Vanek's scored four of those goals, the last two of Vanek's were on assists from Ennis. Either way, the PP isn't exactly sterling right now.
I'm far from crapping on either of them- I like the way the game they bring in the offensive zone, and I'm excited to watch them both develop.
#12
Posted 10 February 2013 - 03:49 PM
716, on 10 February 2013 - 11:48 AM, said:
Sorry, the case isn't nearly closed and won't be for a long time. Everything could look totally different again in another 10 games. Plus, let's see what Hodgson's numbers look like when Vanek cools down.
#14
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:40 PM
#15
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:55 PM
IKnowPhysics, on 10 February 2013 - 02:02 PM, said:
Seriously though, Ennis' puck control is better than Hodgson's (and giveaway stats reflect this), and that's something you want with your best guys in a puck control situation like a powerplay.
Best answer I read in a while
#17
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:08 PM
#19
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:24 PM
#25
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:47 AM
Hodgson has been what I hoped for and more.. I can't complain at all.
#26
Posted 14 February 2013 - 08:42 PM
#27
Posted 14 February 2013 - 09:00 PM
notwoz, on 14 February 2013 - 08:42 PM, said:
Commander Cody?
I am more of a Commander Tom guy.
(although I have seen Commander Cody in concert.)
#30
Posted 15 February 2013 - 08:56 AM












