OT: Roller Blades/Inline Skates
#1
Posted 05 February 2013 - 06:19 PM
#2
Posted 05 February 2013 - 06:21 PM
#3
Posted 05 February 2013 - 08:36 PM
d4rksabre, on 05 February 2013 - 06:21 PM, said:
I see they've got seven different models. Is their base model really cheap? I know you get what you pay for, just wondering if the lower models of a brand name is better than middle of the road of a lesser brand.
Anybody else?
#4
Posted 05 February 2013 - 08:39 PM
JJFIVEOH, on 05 February 2013 - 08:36 PM, said:
Anybody else?
I've been using the lower end of their Vapor (Vapor 20s) line for ice hockey for four years now without a problem. I guess it's about what you think you feel like spending and what is comfortable. I'm not sure I'd go below the lower-middle end bracket but I see no reason to shell out for anything above high-mid unless you're playing competitively.
#5
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:15 PM
JJFIVEOH, on 05 February 2013 - 06:19 PM, said:
#6
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:44 PM
d4rksabre, on 05 February 2013 - 06:21 PM, said:
This.
I used to play a lot of roller, but I cut that down when I picked up ice about 9 years ago. I have a pair of Bauer ice skates that rock (2009 X60s), and if I ever decided on a new pair of inlines, I'd get the same boot or a cheaper version of the same boot. The new Bauer inlines have similar features that I enjoyed on my old mission skates too (Bauer bought Mission). Just taking a quick look, I'd probably take a long look at the XR2s, XR3s and maybe XR4s.
Much of my content with Bauer is all based on the skates fitting both my foot and the way I skate extremely well, but the durability of my skates has been great too. YMMV. Bauers may not fit you the best- and a great fit is the most important thing. If you're just getting started at it again, maybe examine the next-to-cheapest in the line of skates that fit you best. If you're not playing more than twice a week or so, you're probably not pounding the hell out of them, so as previously deduced, it's not worth the money.
#7
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:47 PM
IKnowPhysics, on 05 February 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:
I used to play a lot of roller, but I cut that down when I picked up ice about 9 years ago. I have a pair of Bauer ice skates that rock (2009 X60s), and if I ever decided on a new pair of inlines, I'd get the same boot or a cheaper version of the same boot. The new Bauer inlines have similar features that I enjoyed on my old mission skates too (Bauer bought Mission). Just taking a quick look, I'd probably take a long look at the XR2s, XR3s and maybe XR4s.
Much of my content with Bauer is all based on the skates fitting both my foot and the way I skate extremely well, but the durability of my skates has been great too. YMMV. Bauers may not fit you the best- and a great fit is the most important thing. If you're just getting started at it again, maybe examine the next-to-cheapest in the line of skates that fit you best. If you're not playing more than twice a week or so, you're probably not pounding the hell out of them, so as previously deduced, it's not worth the money.
Yup, fit is everything. I had a pair of Eastons for a while and when I switched to the Vapor line I found myself how I had ever even managed to skate in the Eastons. My feet love the Vapor boot.
#8
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:46 PM
#9
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:58 PM
JJFIVEOH, on 05 February 2013 - 10:46 PM, said:
Mission should be fine. I don't know anything about K2.
#10
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:10 PM
d4rksabre, on 05 February 2013 - 10:58 PM, said:
All I have to base it on is Inline skate review searches. http://k2skates.com/inline-skates
#11
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:32 PM
Edit: And your link confirms that. If you want to play hockey, get a hockey skate. If you want to skate along the beach in a white leotard like you're in a tampon commercial, get a recreational skate.
Edited by IKnowPhysics, 05 February 2013 - 11:34 PM.
#12
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:42 PM
http://www.hockeymon...eoutinline.html
#13
Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:54 AM
#14
Posted 06 February 2013 - 04:56 AM
#15
Posted 08 February 2013 - 05:57 PM
#16
Posted 08 February 2013 - 08:07 PM
JJFIVEOH, on 08 February 2013 - 05:57 PM, said:
I think the biggest difference between inline hockey skates and regular rollerblades is the ability to take a puck. I've seen guys get hit in the skate with a puck and the buckles (is that what they're called, those ratchet thingys) just exploded and he couldn't use his skate. Go with laces.
#17
Posted 08 February 2013 - 08:22 PM
#18
Posted 08 February 2013 - 08:27 PM
JJFIVEOH, on 08 February 2013 - 05:57 PM, said:
Rec skates are designed to be cushy comfortable (like a hiking boot) and as much like speed skating ice skates as possible. They have long, tall chassis with uniformly large wheels. They're soft-sided to be comfy and stay cool. Some rec skates have brakes, which, depending on how you skate, could be a hindrance.
Hockey skates are designed to take pucks and sticks and are as much like hockey ice skates as possible. The have compact chassis designed to be fast and efficient, but not be so long- so that they feel like a hockey blade instead of a speed skate blade- this makes them capable of being more agile than longer rec chassis. The boot uses laces to stay tighter than rec skates and is hard and durable enough to take pucks. The stiffer boot also transfers energy better than a rec skate (this is compensated by the longer chassis on a rec skate).
Edited by IKnowPhysics, 08 February 2013 - 08:28 PM.
#19
Posted 08 February 2013 - 10:11 PM
I'm getting the impression they are pretty much identical with the exception of aesthetics. There are exactly 7 models for each and it seems each upgrade is the same.
Edited by JJFIVEOH, 08 February 2013 - 10:28 PM.












