Edited by Spndnchz, 05 February 2013 - 06:50 AM.
GDT: Sabres @ Senators 7:30 pm 2-5-13
#1
Posted 05 February 2013 - 12:42 AM
#2
Posted 05 February 2013 - 12:56 AM
#3
Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:35 AM
#4
Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:42 AM
Thats all I got. Its getting difficult to get excited about our chances.
#5
Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:44 AM
sizzlemeister, on 05 February 2013 - 01:35 AM, said:
Ehrhoff may not be 100%. Ott may also not be 100%. Pominville, Hodgson & Hecht were the other ones who didn't skate.
#6
Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:46 AM
Reading that out loud, I'm mildly disgusted with myself...however this team puts me in that kind of mood these days.
Go Sabres
#7
Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:36 AM
#8
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:09 AM
Edited by Heimdall, 05 February 2013 - 04:12 AM.
#9
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:19 AM
sizzlemeister, on 05 February 2013 - 01:35 AM, said:
Pardy, Pardy. So, didn't we learn from practice today that there are some possible scratches from the forward ranks? Is he sitting Myers?
We may see Lindy dress 7 defensemen, his answer to the scoring slump.
nobody, on 05 February 2013 - 01:44 AM, said:
It's no wonder Hecht is sitting, he played over 21 minutes Sunday, that's 3 games for a 4th line (should be) center.
Speaking of the 4th line, in the 2nd game in 24 hours, the 4th line gets 4 minutes TOI, it should be no surprise that the team looked gassed in the 3rd period. In the first game the 4th line got double that.
Edited by kishoph, 05 February 2013 - 04:31 AM.
#10
Posted 05 February 2013 - 08:11 AM
#12
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:06 AM
As for losing for the draft pick, my uncle brought this up at our superbowl party and I just think it's way too early for that. Also, despite the fact we're not that good of a team, I still don't think we're bad enough to really be within the bottom two or three teams in the league. We would need a Vanek and possibly Miller season ending injury to even have a slim chance at that.
To Admins: I'd say 20% of the time when I want to post a comment my screen will look like it's thinking and it says saving post but never actually posts. I have to copy what I wrote, refresh the page, paste it and hit post again and it usually works. It's happening on my work and two home computers. What's up with that? Is anyone else experiencing this? It's been happening over the previous six months I'd say.
#14
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:11 AM
#15
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:17 AM
#17
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:35 AM
CallawaySabres, on 05 February 2013 - 09:17 AM, said:
I'm leaning more towards Lindy being safe no matter what happens the rest of this season. The lockout excuse is a nice and convenient one to explain falling short of expectations. I suppose that if they completely fall apart and finish last in the league that he might go after the season, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
#18
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:38 AM
Derrico, on 05 February 2013 - 09:06 AM, said:
As for losing for the draft pick, my uncle brought this up at our superbowl party and I just think it's way too early for that. Also, despite the fact we're not that good of a team, I still don't think we're bad enough to really be within the bottom two or three teams in the league. We would need a Vanek and possibly Miller season ending injury to even have a slim chance at that.
To Admins: I'd say 20% of the time when I want to post a comment my screen will look like it's thinking and it says saving post but never actually posts. I have to copy what I wrote, refresh the page, paste it and hit post again and it usually works. It's happening on my work and two home computers. What's up with that? Is anyone else experiencing this? It's been happening over the previous six months I'd say.
I have the same problem. Doesn't happen on other forums using the same software.
Edit- happened to me when replying to this post.
#20
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:50 AM
weave, on 05 February 2013 - 09:38 AM, said:
I have the same problem. Doesn't happen on other forums using the same software.
Edit- happened to me when replying to this post.
Happens to me frequently. Has been since the big forum upgrade. Any time I mentioned it was told it was my fault or ignored. Good luck!
#21
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:54 AM
weave, on 05 February 2013 - 09:38 AM, said:
Edit- happened to me when replying to this post.
sizzlemeister, on 05 February 2013 - 09:50 AM, said:
"crap, the board is Sizzlemeisting my post again!"
#22
Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:59 AM
#27
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:22 AM
#28
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:31 AM
The only line capable of prolonged puck posession is the V-H-P line and if the Sabres score 4 goals 3 will be from that line with 1 fluke won coming from somewhere else. WIth Spezza down I see no reason this team can't beat an Ottawa team that I think lacks depth, but the Sabres will be tires or unfocused, or some other bs excuse as to why they cant pull it off. This team has 0 accountability.
#29
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:34 AM
LGR4GM, on 05 February 2013 - 10:31 AM, said:
#30
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:37 AM
Claude_Verret, on 05 February 2013 - 09:35 AM, said:
Sabres will win in glorious fashion. 9-1. Vanek with the ovechtrick.
Edited by qwksndmonster, 05 February 2013 - 10:38 AM.
#31
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:50 AM
LGR4GM, on 05 February 2013 - 10:31 AM, said:
The only line capable of prolonged puck posession is the V-H-P line and if the Sabres score 4 goals 3 will be from that line with 1 fluke won coming from somewhere else. WIth Spezza down I see no reason this team can't beat an Ottawa team that I think lacks depth, but the Sabres will be tires or unfocused, or some other bs excuse as to why they cant pull it off. This team has 0 accountability.
As for the Pardy/Myers combo, It may not help Myers game, but can it hurt it anymore? Maybe they are being paired together because they are both going to have their ice times limited?
#32
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:55 AM
We really need some secondary scoring. The top line is carrying the team again like last year's start, but how long until they slump?
#33
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:56 AM
qwksndmonster, on 05 February 2013 - 10:37 AM, said:
Sabres will win in glorious fashion. 9-1. Vanek with the ovechtrick.
I'm not saying that it's a legitimate one, but it's going to be at least hinted at when the Sabres end up falling short of the playoffs. You can take it to the bank.
#34
Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:58 AM
we played close against Ottawa last year (3-1-2, 4 OT/SO games)
year be for that 5 of six were decided by 1 goal or 2 with an empty netter at the end.
So I don't think I'll get my blowout win tonight.
#35
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:00 AM
If the team defense does not improve in this game I'm afraid of another Montreal like meltdown. Best case Miller has an olympic performance and we win a 2-1 SO.
What I really want to see win or lose is an inspired team performance(ala Boston) and for John Scott to pummel Chris Neal because I still loathe that piece of shaught.
Let's Go Buff-a-lo !
Edited by R_dudly, 05 February 2013 - 11:03 AM.
#36
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:02 AM
Grigo scores to make it 1-0
Alfie scores to make it 1-1 on the powerplay
Second Period:
Pretty dull, good hockey by both teams
Third Period:
Ennis misses on the breakaway
Foligno misses on a gaping net
The last ten minutes the sabres become physical
Foligno gets the Karruba collision
OT:
Sabres are strong at cycling the puck
Myers makes some big plays in the offensive zone
Passes the puck to Ott who scores
Three stars
Ott
Grigo
Anderson
#37
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:15 AM
#39
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:19 AM
nfreeman, on 05 February 2013 - 11:15 AM, said:
#40
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:19 AM












