GDT: Panthers at Sabres 3PM 2-3-13
#1
Posted 03 February 2013 - 12:52 AM
#2
Posted 03 February 2013 - 01:37 AM
#3
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:02 AM
This team is 3 4 1, tomorrow 3 5 1
And we still believe that Myers can be our franchise d man, although he sho another devastating -3 performance.
I hope we do not have many injuries this season, so we do not have an excuse for this unacceptable performance.
Sorry, i saw the game yesterday and i am still sooo disapointed.
#4
Posted 03 February 2013 - 03:42 AM
#5
Posted 03 February 2013 - 04:06 AM
#6
Posted 03 February 2013 - 04:30 AM
You know, so they can suck the next time out again
#7
Posted 03 February 2013 - 06:41 AM
#8
Posted 03 February 2013 - 06:52 AM
#9
Posted 03 February 2013 - 08:25 AM
#10
Posted 03 February 2013 - 08:25 AM
#11
Posted 03 February 2013 - 08:58 AM
Then we play the Canadiens and I'm thinking, "If they look like they have so far (sans Boston) for the rest of the year, we aren't going to get into the playoffs and changes will have to be made. But it won't matter because they just extended Darcy and he's not going to do anything with Ruff.
How do I stop my head from exploding?
#12
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:02 AM
#13
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:35 AM
#14
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:36 AM
#15
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:41 AM
#16
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:49 AM
#17
Posted 03 February 2013 - 09:55 AM
2nd end of a back to back in a game where we just got embarrassed badly. Is our confidence even more shot today? Today's game may just be more telling than yesterday's flop, it was somewhat expected after a Boston victory, but do we have the stones today to come. Back from the worst game of the season.
And please, someone on the 2nd 3rd or 4th line start putting the puck in the net.
#18
Posted 03 February 2013 - 10:09 AM
#19
Posted 03 February 2013 - 10:43 AM
Another stat we believe: Jordan Leopold is minus-7 -- the worst rating for any NHL defenseman. Myers is minus-6.
#20
Posted 03 February 2013 - 10:52 AM
wyldnwoody44, on 03 February 2013 - 09:55 AM, said:
2nd end of a back to back in a game where we just got embarrassed badly. Is our confidence even more shot today? Today's game may just be more telling than yesterday's flop, it was somewhat expected after a Boston victory, but do we have the stones today to come. Back from the worst game of the season.
And please, someone on the 2nd 3rd or 4th line start putting the puck in the net.
And please, Myers and Leopold - Stop making Ryan digging the puck out of OUR net,
#21
Posted 03 February 2013 - 11:18 AM
#23
Posted 03 February 2013 - 11:37 AM
Not sure what team I'll see today either.
So Lindy tried to re-invent himself again this offseason, kinder gentler. I want to see him take charge and get this team to play within itself. For me that starts with Miller and the Defense. I don't care if they win 1-0 in a SO I want to see Lindy start with establishing some consitency having the defense play stay at home defense till the other lines and players sort them selves out. Coming off 3 games in 4 nights that should not be hard to establish since he himself said he wants no more pond hockey. I'm still seeing too much of that. If he does not know how to get his team to eliminate it than he does not deserve to be coaching a NHL team.
Let's Go Buff-a-lo !
#24
Posted 03 February 2013 - 11:38 AM
#25
Posted 03 February 2013 - 12:07 PM
1. Leopold-Myers
2. Foligno-Enis-Stafford
If the above decided to show up this season, this would be a reasonably competitive playoff-caliber team.
#26
Posted 03 February 2013 - 12:10 PM
wyldnwoody44, on 03 February 2013 - 09:55 AM, said:
2nd end of a back to back in a game where we just got embarrassed badly. Is our confidence even more shot today? Today's game may just be more telling than yesterday's flop, it was somewhat expected after a Boston victory, but do we have the stones today to come. Back from the worst game of the season.
And please, someone on the 2nd 3rd or 4th line start putting the puck in the net.
You and I recall the same. Even when we were rolling back in 06-07 the Panthers always made us look stupid. This team doesn't get up for the Panthers. Unfortunately I expect a loss in a real snoozer of a game. 2-0 Florida.
#27
Posted 03 February 2013 - 12:26 PM
d4rksabre, on 03 February 2013 - 12:10 PM, said:
Has anybody said "take them lightly" yet? Sabres/Sabres fans overrate everything.
#28
Posted 03 February 2013 - 12:31 PM
Me: (checking roster online) No.
FYO: Sabres will win today because Florida isn't as good as the Sabres. They don't even have one Cody, we have two.
He was really excited that his favorite player got back last night. He thought #8 was the only guy who was trying to win.
#29
Posted 03 February 2013 - 12:39 PM
Billy Fuccillo, on 03 February 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:
1. Leopold-Myers
2. Foligno-Enis-Stafford
If the above decided to show up this season, this would be a reasonably competitive playoff-caliber team.
#30
Posted 03 February 2013 - 01:26 PM
#31
Posted 03 February 2013 - 01:38 PM
PS:
I have a question for you guys ! I was looking through the stats and what does s/g and sa/g mean?
idk why i don't know .. if anyone could help me out that'd be great....
it says Florida 29.0 s/g Buffalo 31.8 s/g Florida 33.3 sa/g Buffalo 34.0 sa/g
thnx
Edited by BuffaloBorn, 03 February 2013 - 01:40 PM.
#32
Posted 03 February 2013 - 01:44 PM
BuffaloBorn, on 03 February 2013 - 01:38 PM, said:
PS:
I have a question for you guys ! I was looking through the stats and what does s/g and sa/g mean?
idk why i don't know .. if anyone could help me out that'd be great....
it says Florida 29.0 s/g Buffalo 31.8 s/g Florida 33.3 sa/g Buffalo 34.0 sa/g
thnx
I think s/g is "shots for" per game and sa/g is "shots against" per game.
#33
Posted 03 February 2013 - 01:51 PM
#35
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:06 PM
d4rksabre, on 03 February 2013 - 02:00 PM, said:
Boudreau never should have tried to turn the team into a shut-down defensive team without the right personnel or personalities, which was probably the biggest contributor to losing Ovechkin and the rest of the locker room. Although, I do wonder if that was mandated from upstairs since they hired an insanely defensive coach after firing Boudreau. Whoever made the decision, trying to shackle that team's elite offensive talent in a trap-like system was about the worst thing they could have done IMO. And now, they just don't have the talent they used to (and yes, I'm including Ovechkin as part of that statement--he's definitely in decline).
#36
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:12 PM
Billy Fuccillo, on 03 February 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:
1. Leopold-Myers
2. Foligno-Enis-Stafford
If the above decided to show up this season, this would be a reasonably competitive playoff-caliber team.
Foligno has been playing better of late. But what about Lindy's coaching system/message. I'm sure the players are tired of hearing the sameshit over and over and over again. With one of the highest payrolls in the league this team is a mess.
TrueBluePhD, on 03 February 2013 - 02:06 PM, said:
Washington has been getting worse and this years team isn't that good. Washington did Boudreau a favor as I would much rather be in Anaheim.
I would love for Buffalo to get rid of Matt Ellis and bring up Kevin Porter or someone else from Rochester that can actually add offense. Don't get me wrong you have an energy guy in Ellis but he brings no offense to the table at all.
#37
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:21 PM
TrueBluePhD, on 03 February 2013 - 02:06 PM, said:
Boudreau never should have tried to turn the team into a shut-down defensive team without the right personnel or personalities, which was probably the biggest contributor to losing Ovechkin and the rest of the locker room. Although, I do wonder if that was mandated from upstairs since they hired an insanely defensive coach after firing Boudreau. Whoever made the decision, trying to shackle that team's elite offensive talent in a trap-like system was about the worst thing they could have done IMO. And now, they just don't have the talent they used to (and yes, I'm including Ovechkin as part of that statement--he's definitely in decline).
In agreement with you, I don't think defense-first was Boudreau's plan. He's not running a system like that in Anaheim as far as I know. I wonder just how much Ovechkin contributes to the problem. I wonder if he would prefer to be a component in a team rather than it's hood ornament. Almost makes logical the notion of trying to get him in Buffalo with young kids like Grigorenko, Foligno, Hodgson and Ennis. Plus vets like Vanek and Pommers.
#38
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:32 PM
#39
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:40 PM
#40
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:42 PM












