GDT: Sabres at Canadiens - 2:00 PM - 2/2/13
#1
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:19 AM
Defenseman Andrei Markov is off to a hot start, with 8 points in his last 5 games, including 4 goals. Carey Price is holding the fort well, surrendering fewer than 2.00 goals per 60 minutes to complement a 4-1-0 record.
Will Vanek continue his scorching start? More importantly, could the Sabres survive if his line has an off day?
#2
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:21 AM
#4
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:31 AM
NowDoYouBelieve, on 02 February 2013 - 08:19 AM, said:
Defenseman Andrei Markov is off to a hot start, with 8 points in his last 5 games, including 4 goals. Carey Price is holding the fort well, surrendering fewer than 2.00 goals per 60 minutes to complement a 4-1-0 record.
Will Vanek continue his scorching start? More importantly, could the Sabres survive if his line has an off day?
Weber, Sekera and Ehrhoff carried the day on the blue line for the Sabres, they need bounce back games from Myers, Leopold and Sulzer to give the Sabres a more consistent game from the blue line.
Vanek and Pominville are putting up some MVP type numbers early in the season. The Sabres scored 7 goals against the Bruins and only 1 did not involve Vanek or Pominville. The story will be secondary scoring until someone else starts to show up on the scoreboard with some consistency.
#5
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:35 AM
NowDoYouBelieve, on 02 February 2013 - 08:28 AM, said:
I'll be walking the University of Florida campus for Parents' Day. Go Gators. I'll watch this game tomorrow morning. That's not my reason for posting, however.
I am feeling the compressed season sensation with shorter intervals between games. I wake up, and there's another GDT. I love it, but I don't have injuries or fatigue. It will be interesting to watch teams for the next few months.
#6
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:40 AM
#7
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:44 AM
Neo, on 02 February 2013 - 08:35 AM, said:
After the 2 games he has played this year and considering how solid and dependable he has been, I see no reason Mike Weber should ever be taken out of the lineup. We all want toughness and he is our toughest defender. The kid works hard every game and seems to have worked hard all summer with his buddy Ott to make sure he is doing the little things. He said it himself that he plays a simple game and you know what? If more of our defenders played a bit more of simpler game we would be better off. Mike Weber is awesome.
That being said, I think this team should hang a full size poster of Lucic runnin miller in their locker room. Before every game they should look at it and remember that although they beat the Bruins once they are 1 play away from being a soft team again. They haven't proved anything, yet.
They need to dominate a physically inferior Habs team and keep bringing the intensity which I believe they have. Ott, Foligno, Weber, Scott, hell even Stafford has been physical and that forces players to cough up pucks and to think and all sorts of issues. This team needs to play with grit. Vanek and Pominville are on a entire different level... it has been years since I have scene a line that makes me excited whenever it touches the ice.
they haven't won or proven anything... yet.
Edited by LGR4GM, 02 February 2013 - 08:45 AM.
#9
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:08 AM
#10
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:15 AM
#12
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:18 AM
OverPowerYou, on 02 February 2013 - 09:15 AM, said:
Braedon, on 02 February 2013 - 09:16 AM, said:
Edited by LGR4GM, 02 February 2013 - 09:22 AM.
#13
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:19 AM
OverPowerYou, on 02 February 2013 - 09:15 AM, said:
#14
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:21 AM
That being said we have to build on the Boston game and dominate Montreal.
Scroll down below the crap about expansion and you will see a big picture of Scott beating Thornton. Read that part, it is all about how tougher does not mean better and I think there is a point to that but again thats what makes this game important...
http://sports.yahoo....dGlvbnM-;_ylv=3
Edited by LGR4GM, 02 February 2013 - 09:30 AM.
#15
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:29 AM
More of that, please.
#16
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:36 AM
LGR4GM, on 02 February 2013 - 09:18 AM, said:
CoughGoDawgsCough
No need to be implicit, you shouldnt be ashamed. I was at Capital One this year, UGA looked good. We'll see how you do this year without Jarvis, Murray, Ogletree and Williams.
Habs may have Pancioretty and Subban back. Interested to see if our pairings change after Thursday.
#17
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:40 AM
Meathead, on 02 February 2013 - 08:40 AM, said:
Montreal has no designated fighter. If ever there was a game to sit Scott, this would be it. But given the injury situation I'm not sure they have a healthy replacement for him.
They have Brandon Prust but he's a 200lb-er. We have the tools to deal with him without Scott in the lineup.
#19
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:26 AM
Has the team turned a corner, and will they build on the strong effort against Boston, or will it be the Sabres of old who usually follow up a strong game with a lacklustre loss?
Time will tell.
#21
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:35 AM
#22
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:41 AM
LastPommerFan, on 02 February 2013 - 10:35 AM, said:
Man, the first half of the season was crazy. Remember Grigorenko's 4 goal night on opening day? And when Hecht ran off to live with the polar bears on the trip to Edmonton?
#23
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:41 AM
I am somewhat afraid of a let down after the great effort against the Bruins. I hope the strong effort continues.
I predict a 4 - 1 win for the good guys. Since the game is in Quebec, maybe some of Grigorenko's family will be in attendance. If so, I expect a strong game from him ... 2 Gs and an A.
Must. Win. Game.
#24
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:45 AM
Sabres Fan In NS, on 02 February 2013 - 10:41 AM, said:
I am somewhat afraid of a let down after the great effort against the Bruins. I hope the strong effort continues.
I predict a 4 - 1 win for the good guys. Since the game is in Quebec, maybe some of Grigorenko's family will be in attendance. If so, I expect a strong game from him ... 2 Gs and an A.
Must. Win. Game.
#25
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:47 AM
Robviously, on 02 February 2013 - 10:45 AM, said:
#26
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:47 AM
Derrico, on 02 February 2013 - 10:46 AM, said:
NO. Enroth must start tomorrow. Bad precedent. We don't have 2 days off in a row until valentines day.
#27
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:50 AM
Robviously, on 02 February 2013 - 10:45 AM, said:
Nope and time is just a relative thing used to measure ... blah, blah, blah ...
Derrico, on 02 February 2013 - 10:47 AM, said:
Saddle up ...
I say Miller plays both games this weekend.
#29
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:00 AM
Is this the lay down team of years past or has a changing of the wind struck buffalo?
I think we get a shootout tonight. I also predict that there will be at least two icing calls, 3 missed penalties, 5 offsides and a fan thrown out for drunken debauchery
#30
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:03 AM
weave, on 02 February 2013 - 09:40 AM, said:
They have Brandon Prust but he's a 200lb-er. We have the tools to deal with him without Scott in the lineup.
But we are talking about Lindy - he won't change the lineup.
#31
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:04 AM
Isn't someone going to bring up the hooey about the refs favoring Montreal in that building?
#32
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:07 AM
#33
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:07 AM
#34
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:09 AM
LastPommerFan, on 02 February 2013 - 10:52 AM, said:
Ok.
I remember reading that our friend Robviously is in Chicago. So, you can't argue against the fact that he IS in the future. Right?
So, Roby, since you are in the future, at least by LPF's reasoning, which Sabres team will show up?
#35
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:15 AM
Sabres Fan In NS, on 02 February 2013 - 11:09 AM, said:
I remember reading that our friend Robviously is in Chicago. So, you can't argue against the fact that he IS in the future. Right?
So, Roby, since you are in the future, at least by LPF's reasoning, which Sabres team will show up?
No way, if you travel from detroit to chicago, you land about 5 minutes before you took off.Clearly you have traveled back in time to get there.
#36
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:53 AM
LastPommerFan, on 02 February 2013 - 11:15 AM, said:
Your sig is one of the funniest things I've ever read. It's better if it was unintentionally funny, but, I don't know, bio is pretty sly.
#38
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:59 AM
nobody, on 02 February 2013 - 11:03 AM, said:
weave, on 02 February 2013 - 09:40 AM, said:
They have Brandon Prust but he's a 200lb-er. We have the tools to deal with him without Scott in the lineup.
Does Lindy even have a healthy option right now?












