Lockout Protest ?
#1
Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:16 PM
#2
Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:24 PM
#3
Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:30 PM
Edited by bunomatic, 08 January 2013 - 11:41 PM.
#4
Posted 08 January 2013 - 11:45 PM
#5
Posted 09 January 2013 - 01:04 AM
#7
Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:03 AM
I wouldn't do that to the local businesses who support the Sabres though.
#8
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:22 AM
#9
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:32 AM
#11
Posted 09 January 2013 - 10:26 AM
#12
Posted 09 January 2013 - 10:55 AM
#14
Posted 09 January 2013 - 11:28 AM
Would also be nice to see all the arena workers and other staff that were out of work for the lockout stage a one game walkout to express their displeasure, but again will never happen
Personally, I would say that everyone in the arena should Boo when the teams are announced coming out of the lockerrooms to start the games (I would add throwing stuff on the ice, but that may go too far), but again that won't happen either
Some fans will be lost, but the majority of the sheep will come right back with the attitude of all is forgiven because you came back and can continue to take my money and entertain me for a little while. The players and owners know this, so they issue an "apology" to the fans, and will say thank you on the ice, maybe give out a shiney trinket at the home opener (Last time they gave out mini NHL Stanley Cups as you left the arena), and everyones happy.
you will never get enough people to go along with any kind of large scale protest because the sheep will never play along, unless you could do it in the form of a "Flash Mob", people seem to love getting into those things
#15
Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:15 PM
I kinda think the people who are complaining like someone stole their binky are more the sheep.
#16
Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:31 PM
#17
Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:57 PM
SwampD, on 09 January 2013 - 12:15 PM, said:
I kinda think the people who are complaining like someone stole their binky are more the sheep.
Yeah, I don't get it. Hockey is entertainment,
#18
Posted 09 January 2013 - 01:55 PM
#19
Posted 09 January 2013 - 02:11 PM
The issue that most have with what happened is that it is entertainment, and the entertainment was taken away because they needed to argue over how to divide the money that we give them for this entertainment. We the consumers are what make their industry possible, and they show now respect to us and just expect that we will come crawling back to them to give them more of our money because they have given us our entertainment back. The point of an form of protest against the league is to show that you as a consummer of their product/entertainment are not happy that they do not respect the people that pay for their product and that we the consummers are not improtant to them
#20
Posted 09 January 2013 - 02:53 PM
#21
Posted 09 January 2013 - 03:47 PM
#22
Posted 09 January 2013 - 04:22 PM
SwampD, on 09 January 2013 - 12:15 PM, said:
The NHL had something I wanted, too. They withheld it for three months for their own selfish reasons. I'm now returning the favor. I'm glad you are happy to have your binky back.
SwampD, on 09 January 2013 - 12:15 PM, said:
I won't be protesting in any way, shape or form. I've been living my life NHL-free since June and will continue to do so. If that makes ME a sheep, then baa-aa-aa...
Edited by Sabre Dance, 09 January 2013 - 04:22 PM.
#23
Posted 09 January 2013 - 04:29 PM
Eleven, on 09 January 2013 - 03:47 PM, said:
The only thing Bettman said is that they're thinking of something but won't say anything until after the CBA is ratified.
#24
Posted 09 January 2013 - 05:00 PM
Spndnchz, on 09 January 2013 - 04:29 PM, said:
Wonder what the rest of the league will do?
#25
Posted 09 January 2013 - 05:28 PM
The cake is a lie
#26
Posted 09 January 2013 - 06:38 PM
#28
Posted 09 January 2013 - 09:17 PM
#30
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:27 AM
The rest of it, this idea of being cheated by not getting to watch a sport is imaginary to me. Maybe some folks feel disrespected or offended by it, by the crassness of it, disgusted from listening to millionaires argue billionaires. I don't; to me it's a labor issue. It's business. Unfortunately, it's part of the sports industry, at least until they sign a 100 year CBA, and I accept this. I'll remember all of the sniveling and money-grubbing, and that'll reflect on how I view the individuals involved, but that doesn't tarnish the sport to me. I still love hockey at its highest level.
Will I boycott? Nope. Rebel? Nah.
Instead, I'll keep in mind that Joe, Jane, and Bob only got paid for a 48 game season. Maybe I'll tip Joe a little more. Maybe I'll buy that extra Sabres hat from Jane. Maybe grab that extra tallboy of Blue from Bob. I think they'd need it more and appreciate it more than anyone would if I left an empty seat in FNC.
#31
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:13 AM
#32
Posted 10 January 2013 - 08:52 AM
apuszczalowski, on 09 January 2013 - 02:11 PM, said:
The issue that most have with what happened is that it is entertainment, and the entertainment was taken away because they needed to argue over how to divide the money that we give them for this entertainment. We the consumers are what make their industry possible, and they show now respect to us and just expect that we will come crawling back to them to give them more of our money because they have given us our entertainment back. The point of an form of protest against the league is to show that you as a consummer of their product/entertainment are not happy that they do not respect the people that pay for their product and that we the consummers are not improtant to them
I don't get that upset, and honestly, don't understand those that get upset or go too overboard with the exhuberance either. Now, complaining... That is part of the entertainment, no?
#33
Posted 10 January 2013 - 09:01 AM
weave, on 10 January 2013 - 08:52 AM, said:
Now let's see some hockey!
#34
Posted 10 January 2013 - 09:36 AM
IKnowPhysics, on 10 January 2013 - 03:27 AM, said:
The rest of it, this idea of being cheated by not getting to watch a sport is imaginary to me. Maybe some folks feel disrespected or offended by it, by the crassness of it, disgusted from listening to millionaires argue billionaires. I don't; to me it's a labor issue. It's business. Unfortunately, it's part of the sports industry, at least until they sign a 100 year CBA, and I accept this. I'll remember all of the sniveling and money-grubbing, and that'll reflect on how I view the individuals involved, but that doesn't tarnish the sport to me. I still love hockey at its highest level.
Will I boycott? Nope. Rebel? Nah.
Instead, I'll keep in mind that Joe, Jane, and Bob only got paid for a 48 game season. Maybe I'll tip Joe a little more. Maybe I'll buy that extra Sabres hat from Jane. Maybe grab that extra tallboy of Blue from Bob. I think they'd need it more and appreciate it more than anyone would if I left an empty seat in FNC.
I like the sentiment. Actually, the main reason the lockout "offended" me is that the bartenders, restaurant owners and arena workers got shortchanged. My co-worker's daughter works at the FNC as a waitress and was planning on using that extra money to buy Christmas presents. Obviously, that extra money wound up being zero.
Yeah, I know NHL hockey is business and that we all knew of the forthcoming labor issue last summer. I just think it was very bad publicity for a league that is still struggling to get higher ratings on TV than soccer. (Or maybe all the exposure on the news WAS good publicity.)
In any event, little of this CB foolishness impacted my life. I went to work, I had dinner with friends and I watched a lot of bad TV. All it has done is erode my enthusiasm for what I once thought was the greatest sport in the world. If the NHL and the players can live with that (and they certainly can), so can I. 'Nuff said.
#35
Posted 10 January 2013 - 09:58 AM
#36
Posted 10 January 2013 - 10:00 AM
JJFIVEOH, on 09 January 2013 - 06:38 PM, said:
Eleven, on 09 January 2013 - 10:22 PM, said:
Seriously though I know my minor protest (not getting center ice or buying merch) will not do anything, but if the NHL does not want to respect me by starting the season on time then I will not be gracing them with any of my money. I figure the lockout was 113 days and its the 3rd lockout in my lifetime so 113 x 3 = 339 days of not spending money on these c#*!mongers
#37
Posted 10 January 2013 - 10:35 AM
LGR4GM, on 10 January 2013 - 10:00 AM, said:
Seriously though I know my minor protest (not getting center ice or buying merch) will not do anything, but if the NHL does not want to respect me by starting the season on time then I will not be gracing them with any of my money. I figure the lockout was 113 days and its the 3rd lockout in my lifetime so 113 x 3 = 339 days of not spending money on these c#*!mongers
The previous lockout was 365 days.











