Jump to content


Sabres Harbor Center updates

off topic

  • Please log in to reply
182 replies to this topic

#121 IKnowPhysics

IKnowPhysics

    Third Liner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,760 posts

Posted 01 August 2012 - 10:45 PM

Because U-Stream isn't very well labeled, here's the Paladino proposal: http://www.ustream.t...corded/24279433

Opinion: hate it.  The stated goal of the Paladino proposal is to NOT build an attraction, but a "service" building for existing events.  If there's a definition of more-of-the-same and not bringing in new money to the area, this building is it.  It's like they understand the importance of the block as a keystone between the Canalside, Main Street, and the future of Perry Street, but they refuse to stop themselves from thinking small in its purpose.  They think they're merely building, as they said, "when you boil it down, a large parking facility."

Meanwhile, Cliff Benson's offering everything Paladino's offering, but he forgets the private luxury office space and apartments in favor of community-oriented purpose and a regional attraction.  They come away as really believing they're building a gift for the city.

Edit: LOL, and the first question out of the gate at Paladino is why aren't they building an attraction.  His answer: too much congestion.  WTF!  You WANT congestion downtown!  Build the attractions and then engineer the streets correctly, fool!  Sabres should be a slam dunk.

Edited by IKnowPhysics, 01 August 2012 - 11:13 PM.


#122 Ghost of Dwight Drane

Ghost of Dwight Drane

    First Liner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,358 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 August 2012 - 11:09 PM

View PostIKnowPhysics, on 01 August 2012 - 10:45 PM, said:

Because U-Stream isn't very well labeled, here's the Paladino proposal: http://www.ustream.t...corded/24279433

Opinion: hate it.  The stated goal of the Paladino proposal is to NOT build an attraction, but a "service" building for existing events.  If there's a definition of more-of-the-same and not bringing in new money to the area, this building is it.  It's like they understand the importance of the block as a keystone between the Canalside, Main Street, and the future of Perry Street, but they refuse to stop themselves from thinking small in its purpose.  They think they're merely building, as they said, "when you boil it down, a large parking facility."

Meanwhile, Cliff Benson's offering everything Paladino's offering, but he forgets the private luxury office space and apartments in favor of community-oriented purpose and a regional attraction.  They come away as really believing they're building a gift for the city.

I really like the Sabres idea.....and if everything is equal, would prefer both their plan, and Pegula operating over Paladino.......however all I really want to know are the numbers involved for the taxpayers.

What they have done is pretty much use the Capitals practice facility as the plan. There was already a parking garage and mall there, and the county had to help finance the $43 million facility by issuing bonds. So far so good.....but it looks like the county owns it and the Capitals lease it, using their payments to pay down the debt.

I have no beef if the Sabres bite most of the bullet. I'd like nothing better than to go down and try and scalp tickets....and if I can't get cheapies, go sit at the giant sports bar across the street.

Here's one thing that I have no idea how Washington got away with.....and am very concerned about in the Sabres proposal. In this post 9/11, post OKC/WTC world we live in.........how safe is it to put a public stadium that seats 2,000+ and has multiple facilities geared towards both children and the international commmunity.....directly over 5 stories of parking? You are 5 minutes away from a major border crossing with a country that has a liberal acceptance policy. You are gearing this towards children and hockey. How rare is it to see a van coming in with a dozen giant hockey bags in the back? Or even a few? How secure will this be? Talk about a high value, soft target. Can anyone think of any stadiums that are built directly on an above ground parking facility? I guess Washington is, which really makes me scratch my head.

Again....all things equal, Sabres plan is cool and I would be in favor. Anything I have read though has nothing specific in $$ on the public front.

#123 That Aud Smell

That Aud Smell

    That Nostalgic Olfactory Blend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,636 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Medicine Hat, AB

Posted 02 August 2012 - 05:24 AM

View PostGhost of Dwight Drane, on 01 August 2012 - 09:10 PM, said:

the major Business publication in the city.

Bwa-ha-ha.

(Couldn't resist. Biz First is primarily a clearinghouse for self-serving press releases and an ad-revenue generating gambit.)

#124 PASabreFan

PASabreFan

    Seaman, Mikhail's Navy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,938 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:00 AM

A little perspective here. Terry and Ted said on day one they didn't want to get into the development business, that if positive things happened on the waterfront, they'd settle for an assist — not a goal. Terry also said on Day One he wasn't interested in buying the Amerks and that he didn't want to raise ticket prices. After Benson said in this video that Terry said, before he bought the Sabres, that he wanted to do something to develop the waterfront, I kind of wonder how much I'm supposed to believe from these guys.

Show of hands. Who'd like to see Terry and company concentrate on Job One in Buffalo before moving on to this and that? Dude needs some ADD meds.

#125 TrueBluePhD

TrueBluePhD

    First Liner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,297 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheektowaga, NY

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:25 AM

View PostPASabreFan, on 02 August 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

A little perspective here. Terry and Ted said on day one they didn't want to get into the development business, that if positive things happened on the waterfront, they'd settle for an assist — not a goal. Terry also said on Day One he wasn't interested in buying the Amerks and that he didn't want to raise ticket prices. After Benson said in this video that Terry said, before he bought the Sabres, that he wanted to do something to develop the waterfront, I kind of wonder how much I'm supposed to believe from these guys.

Show of hands. Who'd like to see Terry and company concentrate on Job One in Buffalo before moving on to this and that? Dude needs some ADD meds.

Yes, surely he is incapable of running the Sabres at the same time he does other things.  In fact, I think he should move his residence into the F'nC and never leave, not even for dinner, as to not distract from Job One.  :rolleyes:

#126 d4rksabre

d4rksabre

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,969 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:27 AM

View PostTrueBluePhD, on 02 August 2012 - 09:25 AM, said:

Yes, surely he is incapable of running the Sabres at the same time he does other things.  In fact, I think he should move his residence into the F'nC and never leave, not even for dinner, as to not distract from Job One.  :rolleyes:

:thumbsup:

No one here is ever happy with anything. I swear.

#127 That Aud Smell

That Aud Smell

    That Nostalgic Olfactory Blend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,636 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Medicine Hat, AB

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:34 AM

View PostPASabreFan, on 02 August 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

A little perspective here. Terry and Ted said on day one they didn't want to get into the development business, that if positive things happened on the waterfront, they'd settle for an assist — not a goal.

for those looking for attribution, here's the article PA accurately recalls from march 2011.

http://www.buffalone...rder=ASC&page=1

"Are we going to take the lead on real estate development? It's not my background, it's not my expertise," Black said. "If something's going to happen down there, to use a hockey metaphor, if somebody gets a goal and we can get a second assist and we all get points and it helps Buffalo, we're in favor of it.

"I don't see us taking the lead on developing or insisting it's a certain way, but we certainly want to be ingrained members of the community."

View PostPASabreFan, on 02 August 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

Terry also said on Day One he wasn't interested in buying the Amerks

can't say i recall that. i think he might've punted on the issue. but the reports started within a matter of weeks after Day One that he was looking to buy the amerks (and buy-out the portland deal (in fact, he was probably being respectful of a very fine portland organization when he fudged the issue early on)).


View PostPASabreFan, on 02 August 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

Terry also said on Day One  ... that he didn't want to raise ticket prices.

i can't recall that. he may have intimated it. but i don't think he pledged to run the franchise at a loss. the fact that ticket prices went up is not of great concern to me. yet.


View PostPASabreFan, on 02 August 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

After Benson said in this video that Terry said, before he bought the Sabres, that he wanted to do something to develop the waterfront, I kind of wonder how much I'm supposed to believe from these guys.

i haven't watched the video, but this is interesting. i suspect that, when ted black said what he said, he may have not known pegula's "heart" the way benson did/does and that black was speaking perhaps as much if not more for himself. it is evident that pegula's appetite for development increased once benson joined the franchise in a formal capacity. which is significant.


View PostPASabreFan, on 02 August 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

Show of hands. Who'd like to see Terry and company concentrate on Job One in Buffalo before moving on to this and that? Dude needs some ADD meds.

i am more than satisfied with his concentration on and commitment to Job One. his efforts to beautify and develop the area around his team's arena (center) are in line with his commitment to building "hockey heaven."

Edited by That Aud Smell, 02 August 2012 - 09:35 AM.


#128 shrader

shrader

    Enduring tortures, most of which rhyme

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,533 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston, MA

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:38 AM

View PostTrueBluePhD, on 02 August 2012 - 09:25 AM, said:

Yes, surely he is incapable of running the Sabres at the same time he does other things.  In fact, I think he should move his residence into the F'nC and never leave, not even for dinner, as to not distract from Job One.  :rolleyes:

But don't you see?  All of those people employed within the organization are just drones and they don't actually do anything.  He just hires them to look good in the eyes of the public, like he's creating jobs.  The truth is that he does everything completely on his own.  If you go back and look at those videos of the locker room construction, it was him laying every single brick.  Take a close look the next time you buy a beer at the game.  Terry will be pouring it.

#129 dEnnis the Menace

dEnnis the Menace

    D63

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,008 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NY (Fingerlakes)

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:39 AM

View Postshrader, on 02 August 2012 - 09:38 AM, said:

But don't you see?  All of those people employed within the organization are just drones and they don't actually do anything.  He just hires them to look good in the eyes of the public, like he's creating jobs.  The truth is that he does everything completely on his own.  If you go back and look at those videos of the locker room construction, it was him laying every single brick.  Take a close look the next time you buy a beer at the game.  Terry will be pouring it.

I would love for T-Pegs to pour me a beer.  I think he'd be rather good at it ;)

#130 shrader

shrader

    Enduring tortures, most of which rhyme

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,533 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston, MA

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:40 AM

View PostdEnnis the Menace, on 02 August 2012 - 09:39 AM, said:

I would love for T-Pegs to pour me a beer.  I think he'd be rather good at it ;)

He just raised the prices though, so not only will that beer cost a little extra, it will also be mostly head.

#131 dEnnis the Menace

dEnnis the Menace

    D63

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,008 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NY (Fingerlakes)

Posted 02 August 2012 - 09:44 AM

View Postshrader, on 02 August 2012 - 09:40 AM, said:

He just raised the prices though, so not only will that beer cost a little extra, it will also be mostly head.

Everyone is so negative around here.  There's probably plenty of people who wouldn't mind T-Pegs giving them head... :angel:

I still want my beer though :ph34r:


EDIT: yeah...I know I probably just crossed the line...

Edited by dEnnis the Menace, 02 August 2012 - 09:44 AM.


#132 PASabreFan

PASabreFan

    Seaman, Mikhail's Navy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,938 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 02 August 2012 - 10:52 AM

View PostTrueBluePhD, on 02 August 2012 - 09:25 AM, said:

Yes, surely he is incapable of running the Sabres at the same time he does other things.  In fact, I think he should move his residence into the F'nC and never leave, not even for dinner, as to not distract from Job One.  :rolleyes:
Nice distortion. I'd actually like the polar opposite, or continental opposite. I want Terry to stay in Florida. Set the mission, hire good hockey people, sign the checks, sit back and evaluate. I don't want him anywhere close to "running" the team.

#133 TrueBluePhD

TrueBluePhD

    First Liner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,297 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheektowaga, NY

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:00 AM

View PostPASabreFan, on 02 August 2012 - 10:52 AM, said:

Nice distortion. I'd actually like the polar opposite, or continental opposite. I want Terry to stay in Florida. Set the mission, hire good hockey people, sign the checks, sit back and evaluate. I don't want him anywhere close to "running" the team.

View PostPASabreFan, on 02 August 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

A little perspective here. Terry and Ted said on day one they didn't want to get into the development business, that if positive things happened on the waterfront, they'd settle for an assist — not a goal. Terry also said on Day One he wasn't interested in buying the Amerks and that he didn't want to raise ticket prices. After Benson said in this video that Terry said, before he bought the Sabres, that he wanted to do something to develop the waterfront, I kind of wonder how much I'm supposed to believe from these guys.

Show of hands. Who'd like to see Terry and company concentrate on Job One in Buffalo before moving on to this and that? Dude needs some ADD meds.

So you want him to focus on Job One (presumably winning a Cup?), criticize him for focusing on other things, yet you only want him to hire people and get out of the way?  So he hired people, he's letting them do their jobs (as you wanted him to do), and then you still see fit to criticize him for doing something else?  Why not just come out and say "I'll hate him and crap on everything he does until he fires people" since that's what you obviously are getting at.

#134 PASabreFan

PASabreFan

    Seaman, Mikhail's Navy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,938 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:02 AM

View PostThat Aud Smell, on 02 August 2012 - 09:34 AM, said:

i can't recall that. he may have intimated it. but i don't think he pledged to run the franchise at a loss. the fact that ticket prices went up is not of great concern to me. yet.
He flat out said he didn't want to raise ticket prices. He said at the News editorial board meeting that he would be worried about the public's perception of such a move. And why shouldn't he have been, after clearly giving the impression that he didn't care about money?

#135 PASabreFan

PASabreFan

    Seaman, Mikhail's Navy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,938 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 02 August 2012 - 11:17 AM

View PostTrueBluePhD, on 02 August 2012 - 11:00 AM, said:

So you want him to focus on Job One (presumably winning a Cup?), criticize him for focusing on other things, yet you only want him to hire people and get out of the way?  So he hired people, he's letting them do their jobs (as you wanted him to do), and then you still see fit to criticize him for doing something else?  Why not just come out and say "I'll hate him and crap on everything he does until he fires people" since that's what you obviously are getting at.
That's why I italicized the word hockey. Terry hasn't hired a hockey man yet. He hired an accountant, a former financial officer of the league and in the league, and a lawyer who ran a sports network briefly, among other non-hockey credentials. And he retained another accountant, DiPofi, the former minority owner, who may or may not still be around.

Maybe now it's becoming clearer as to why so many "money guys" are in upper management.

Where are the hockey guys in this franchise? Why isn't a hockey guy in the team president role to evaluate Darcy, if you don't want to fire Darcy right away? Why didn't Darcy hire an assistant GM? Why didn't Lindy really beef up his coaching staff? Money was no object.

Whatever... it probably has little to do with the Webster Block. And I did contradict myself. I shouldn't have implied I want them to focus on the Sabres, and not redeveloping the waterfront. I don't want them focusing on the Sabres, beyond putting smart hockey people in place.

#136 Eleven

Eleven

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,401 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Buffalo

Posted 05 August 2012 - 10:35 AM

So, back around to the topic...

I'm not sure this is a great proposal, actually.  Will two rinks downtown be used?  (Consider the parking expense and the corresponding burden on parents of young players...I think they'd rather play in the suburbs where parking is free.)  

And while I really love the idea of a 200 bed hotel there, I think that means that the Adam's Mark becomes another vacant property that we have to worry about.  The newer downtown hotels are doing very well, as is the refurbished Hyatt, but I think one more 200 bed hotel downtown will kill the Adam's Mark (even with current plans to renovate and rebrand as a Crowne Plaza).  That property isn't convenient to much, and I think it's become a hotel of last resort downtown.  (I think some fans stay there on game nights--but they'd stay across the street from FNC if offered the option.  And I don't think the hotel is used much for anything else anymore.)

So I'm not sure it's the winner.  Drane, of course the process will be affected by politics; it always is.  But Carl Paladino doesn't have too many friends in City Hall.  It is very much the opposite.  I'd expect the battle to be between Pegula and the company in Corning that owns the Adam's Mark.

EDIT:  As for the retail portion of the space, there is PLENTY of unused retail space still available downtown.  There is a whole mall!  Let's fill that up before building more.

Edited by Eleven, 05 August 2012 - 10:43 AM.


#137 That Aud Smell

That Aud Smell

    That Nostalgic Olfactory Blend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,636 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Medicine Hat, AB

Posted 06 August 2012 - 05:22 AM

View PostEleven, on 05 August 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:

I think one more 200 bed hotel downtown will kill the Adam's Mark

EDIT:  As for the retail portion of the space, there is PLENTY of unused retail space still available downtown.  There is a whole mall!  Let's fill that up before building more.

I'm not a developer, nor am I an urban planner. But, from where I sit, a desire to save or rehab long-foundering properties isn't a reason to nix a plan that challenges or threatens to hasten the demise of such properties.

The Adams Mark property has struggled because it's historically been a below average hotel with a poor location. The Main Place Mall has struggled for decades despite having a decent market as a captive audience; if that property failed to make it under those conditions, then perhaps it's time to move on.

It also bears mentioning here that the Donovan Building rehab (a few hundred feet from the site on which Pegula is bidding) will include a hotel.

#138 Robviously

Robviously

    What You Don't See

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,662 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 August 2012 - 09:03 PM

View PostThat Aud Smell, on 06 August 2012 - 05:22 AM, said:

I'm not a developer, nor am I an urban planner. But, from where I sit, a desire to save or rehab long-foundering properties isn't a reason to nix a plan that challenges or threatens to hasten the demise of such properties.

The Adams Mark property has struggled because it's historically been a below average hotel with a poor location. The Main Place Mall has struggled for decades despite having a decent market as a captive audience; if that property failed to make it under those conditions, then perhaps it's time to move on.

It also bears mentioning here that the Donovan Building rehab (a few hundred feet from the site on which Pegula is bidding) will include a hotel.
Agreed.  If our big plan for moving the city into the 21st century requires waiting for failing attractions and buildings to somehow turn around, we might as well throw in the towel now.

The city's best hope for renewal is the Inner Harbor.  We should build it up as much as we can and hope the rest of the city can follow.  I just wish we could get these new hotels and attractions built faster so that we'd have them the next time we host March Madness or (hopefully) another World Juniors.

#139 LabattBlue

LabattBlue

    First Liner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,227 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western New York

Posted 07 August 2012 - 12:15 AM

View PostRobviously, on 06 August 2012 - 09:03 PM, said:

The city's best hope for renewal is the Inner Harbor.  We should build it up as much as we can and hope the rest of the city can follow.  I just wish we could get these new hotels and attractions built faster so that we'd have them the next time we host March Madness or (hopefully) another World Juniors.
I remember after it was announced that the world juniors were coming here(late 2008??), how awesome it would be if the casino/hotel and canalside were done by that time. :(  While the canals are being done this summer, I am nervous about how long it will be before anything is built around them.  After all, putting a few colored adirondack chairs was the "heralded" progress for 2011.

#140 Falstaff

Falstaff

    Top Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 264 posts
  • Location:Philly

Posted 07 August 2012 - 09:29 AM

View PostEleven, on 05 August 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:

And while I really love the idea of a 200 bed hotel there, I think that means that the Adam's Mark becomes another vacant property that we have to worry about.  The newer downtown hotels are doing very well, as is the refurbished Hyatt, but I think one more 200 bed hotel downtown will kill the Adam's Mark

EDIT:  As for the retail portion of the space, there is PLENTY of unused retail space still available downtown.  There is a whole mall!  Let's fill that up before building more.
Let's be honest about the new hotel at the Donovan and the proposed new hotel on the Webster block. The visiting team is going to take a big chunk of one of them every game day/night.  In the summer I'd wager that the visiting team at Coca Cola Field will take a chunk of rooms there as well. They will both be extremely expensive on any event nights.  That's not a bad thing but it is setting more of a new niche in the market, not necessarily replacing one for the other.

As for retail space, you have to put the retail where the people are and where they are going.  Main Place Mall was a terrible idea in 1965 and it's not a better idea now as malls around the country are going belly up.  IMO, the idea of the Canalside project is to reestablish a commercial district downtown that has basically been killed off over the last 25 years. As the commercial/retail core is restablished, pieces of the old retail core on Main St. can be converted to other purposes such as residential and/or just flat out removed.  Albatrosses such as Main Place Mall and the Convention Ctr will probably have to be razed but that's ok because they were mistakes that shouldnt have been built in the first place.  If we want a small convention/event center it would make sense down the line to attach it to the FnC - especially with the new commercial district that will have been established (however convention centers are losers and we should really just get rid of it)

#141 SabresBillsBraves

SabresBillsBraves

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 37 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 August 2012 - 09:12 AM

Hearing that the Sabres Proposal for the Webstor block has been picked!!!

#142 SabresBillsBraves

SabresBillsBraves

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 37 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 August 2012 - 09:34 AM

Here it is: http://www.buffalone...icle1028591.ece

#143 apuszczalowski

apuszczalowski

    Commander of the Armies of the North

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,935 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 August 2012 - 09:36 AM

View PostFalstaff, on 07 August 2012 - 09:29 AM, said:

Let's be honest about the new hotel at the Donovan and the proposed new hotel on the Webster block. The visiting team is going to take a big chunk of one of them every game day/night.  In the summer I'd wager that the visiting team at Coca Cola Field will take a chunk of rooms there as well. They will both be extremely expensive on any event nights.  That's not a bad thing but it is setting more of a new niche in the market, not necessarily replacing one for the other.

As for retail space, you have to put the retail where the people are and where they are going.  Main Place Mall was a terrible idea in 1965 and it's not a better idea now as malls around the country are going belly up.  IMO, the idea of the Canalside project is to reestablish a commercial district downtown that has basically been killed off over the last 25 years. As the commercial/retail core is restablished, pieces of the old retail core on Main St. can be converted to other purposes such as residential and/or just flat out removed.  Albatrosses such as Main Place Mall and the Convention Ctr will probably have to be razed but that's ok because they were mistakes that shouldnt have been built in the first place.  If we want a small convention/event center it would make sense down the line to attach it to the FnC - especially with the new commercial district that will have been established (however convention centers are losers and we should really just get rid of it)
At the most, less then 1/4 of the proposed 200 rooms would be for the visiting NHL team for 41 nights a year (If all teams that come in to play stay atleast one night in town and don't leave right away, and if each player, coach, and employee of that team is given their own room and don't have to share rooms). I highly doubt that any of the traveling teams coming in to play the Bisons are going to stay at somewhere expensive, triple A teams don't have huge budgets and spend alot on accomodations on the road, so if this hotel is more of an "upper scale" place, like one an NHL franchise would use for its players, I doubt a Triple A baseball team will be spending the same.

#144 SabresBillsBraves

SabresBillsBraves

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 37 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 August 2012 - 09:45 AM

Live stream of the press conference at 11
http://www.wgrz.com/...-Developmenting

#145 d4rksabre

d4rksabre

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,969 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 August 2012 - 09:47 AM

This is gonna be so awesome.

#146 MattPie

MattPie

    Hrmph.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,301 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Coatesville, PA

Posted 29 August 2012 - 10:12 AM

Buffalo could actually be building something cool, starting from the canal on out. Interesting.

#147 Eleven

Eleven

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,401 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Buffalo

Posted 29 August 2012 - 10:19 AM

View Postapuszczalowski, on 29 August 2012 - 09:36 AM, said:

At the most, less then 1/4 of the proposed 200 rooms would be for the visiting NHL team for 41 nights a year (If all teams that come in to play stay atleast one night in town and don't leave right away, and if each player, coach, and employee of that team is given their own room and don't have to share rooms). I highly doubt that any of the traveling teams coming in to play the Bisons are going to stay at somewhere expensive, triple A teams don't have huge budgets and spend alot on accomodations on the road, so if this hotel is more of an "upper scale" place, like one an NHL franchise would use for its players, I doubt a Triple A baseball team will be spending the same.

Here's what I know about teams and hotel rooms and retail space:

1.  Everyone at the NHL level gets his/her (in the case of employees) own room; they may or may not want to stay directly across the street from the FNC.  (They would still likely bus it around the FNC because the entrance to the team areas is at the rear (they are not going to walk through hostile fans en route to either the game-day skate or the game itself), and they may want more quiet than what a hotel right across from FNC can provide.)  They usually leave town as soon as the game is over and do not generally stay overnight after a game.  They come in the day before.

2.  AAA baseball teams:  players do share rooms, and they do not stay in hotels of the same caliber; I think the Best Western on Delaware is a popular destination for many of them.

3.  The hotel at Donovan may not have enough rooms for NHL teams, but the Webster hotel will.

4.  The Adam's Mark is toast.  Good thing the buyer didn't pay much for it.  The Embassy Suites, Hampton, and the less expensive hotel at Washington and Chippewa (brand name escapes me) will be just fine, and the Hyatt had better pull its ###### together.

5.  If retail space at the Main Place Mall isn't in the right location, I fail to see how retail space five blocks away is, especially in winter. The Main Place Mall is close to so many workers and should be full of shoppers from roughly 11-2 on weekdays, but is not.  That may be because it's nothing but dollar stores now; does anyone who lived here in the 90s/early 00s remember what types of stores were in that building then?

View PostMattPie, on 29 August 2012 - 10:12 AM, said:

Buffalo could actually be building something cool, starting from the canal on out. Interesting.

The development here in the last eight years has been nothing short of amazing.

#148 IKnowPhysics

IKnowPhysics

    Third Liner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,760 posts

Posted 29 August 2012 - 11:49 AM

View PostEleven, on 29 August 2012 - 10:19 AM, said:

The development here in the last eight years has been nothing short of amazing.

Among many reasons I'm keeping an eye on opportunities to return home.

The decision today marks a significantly right decision by city leadership, a welcome sign of continued improvement after so many decades of significantly wrong decisions. I look forward to playing and watching games, and eating and drinking at the restaurants there.

#149 MattPie

MattPie

    Hrmph.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,301 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Coatesville, PA

Posted 29 August 2012 - 12:17 PM

View PostEleven, on 29 August 2012 - 10:19 AM, said:

If retail space at the Main Place Mall isn't in the right location, I fail to see how retail space five blocks away is, especially in winter. The Main Place Mall is close to so many workers and should be full of shoppers from roughly 11-2 on weekdays, but is not. That may be because it's nothing but dollar stores now; does anyone who lived here in the 90s/early 00s remember what types of stores were in that building then? The development here in the last eight years has been nothing short of amazing.

View PostIKnowPhysics, on 29 August 2012 - 11:49 AM, said:

The decision today marks a significantly right decision by city leadership, a welcome sign of continued improvement after so many decades of significantly wrong decisions. I look forward to playing and watching games, and eating and drinking at the restaurants there.

I'd hope much of that retail space is restaurant/bar related. I think the older generation (which I say starts around 35 (me)) may not come no matter what. Build something that the kids want to hang out at, shops will follow, and the dominos may start to fall. Trying to drag the suburbanites downtown probably won't work, as people upthread have already stated ("Why would I go downtown when I can go to the Galleria?").

#150 That Aud Smell

That Aud Smell

    That Nostalgic Olfactory Blend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,636 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Medicine Hat, AB

Posted 29 August 2012 - 01:04 PM

View PostEleven, on 29 August 2012 - 10:19 AM, said:

5.  If retail space at the Main Place Mall isn't in the right location, I fail to see how retail space five blocks away is, especially in winter. The Main Place Mall is close to so many workers and should be full of shoppers from roughly 11-2 on weekdays, but is not.  That may be because it's nothing but dollar stores now; does anyone who lived here in the 90s/early 00s remember what types of stores were in that building then?

i take your point, but it's also fair to say that the retail model that pegula's project is shooting for is of a different stripe and variety than the main place mall's. i also submit that there's just a certain "stank" that has evolved around the main place mall -- the surrounding work force just hasn't taken the place seriously for years, even decades.

as for your question about stores/tenants of that mall, the google gave me this fascinating site:

http://deadmalls.com...place_mall.html

which says that the main place mall " was once anchored by Kobacker's, which later changed to Sattler's, but that space was turned into a food court on the upper level, and more stores on the lower level. The mall is now basically anchored by office space. There are some traditional stores left such as Payless Shoes, and Waldenbooks. Other mall tenants such as The Limited, Thom McChan shoes, and others, are all gone. Still, the mall continues to struggle forward."

View PostMattPie, on 29 August 2012 - 12:17 PM, said:

Trying to drag the suburbanites downtown probably won't work, as people upthread have already stated ("Why would I go downtown when I can go to the Galleria?").

right or wrong, i am not worried about the people who are saying "meh, i can get about the same experience at the galleria." if the project succeeds, it won't be because those folks poured through the doors early and often -- those folks will be/need to be drawn in eventually, based on early success (generated by other demographics).

one last thought: aren't rinks terrifically expensive to maintain? i got the sense that they have been black holes for municipalities and not-for-profits alike. i'm sure the people who ran the numbers for this project know what they're doing -- it's just a thought.

#151 apuszczalowski

apuszczalowski

    Commander of the Armies of the North

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,935 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 August 2012 - 03:41 PM

View PostEleven, on 29 August 2012 - 10:19 AM, said:

Here's what I know about teams and hotel rooms and retail space:

1.  Everyone at the NHL level gets his/her (in the case of employees) own room; they may or may not want to stay directly across the street from the FNC.  (They would still likely bus it around the FNC because the entrance to the team areas is at the rear (they are not going to walk through hostile fans en route to either the game-day skate or the game itself), and they may want more quiet than what a hotel right across from FNC can provide.)  They usually leave town as soon as the game is over and do not generally stay overnight after a game.  They come in the day before.

2.  AAA baseball teams:  players do share rooms, and they do not stay in hotels of the same caliber; I think the Best Western on Delaware is a popular destination for many of them.

3.  The hotel at Donovan may not have enough rooms for NHL teams, but the Webster hotel will.

4.  The Adam's Mark is toast.  Good thing the buyer didn't pay much for it.  The Embassy Suites, Hampton, and the less expensive hotel at Washington and Chippewa (brand name escapes me) will be just fine, and the Hyatt had better pull its ###### together.

5.  If retail space at the Main Place Mall isn't in the right location, I fail to see how retail space five blocks away is, especially in winter. The Main Place Mall is close to so many workers and should be full of shoppers from roughly 11-2 on weekdays, but is not.  That may be because it's nothing but dollar stores now; does anyone who lived here in the 90s/early 00s remember what types of stores were in that building then?



The development here in the last eight years has been nothing short of amazing.
I thought I had seen/heard before of players sharing rooms sometimes for away games. Either way, at the most, thats what, 30-40 rooms 41 nights out of the year?
As for the Mall, the other issue is that development and retail is getting away from the "Mall" format and more into 'Strip Malls' where each business is located in a strip of stores with all of their access coming from the outside, instead of inside a main corridor. I think one of the issues is that people don't want to park, get out of their car and walk around inside a building to get to only one store, they want to be able to get in and get out of the store quickly and be on there way (of course this is only my opinion on the matter).

And yes, Rinks can be expensive to maintain if they aren't booked up. I know alot of local multi-pad rinks that are struggling to break even or keep ice on all the pads because they don't have the demand to keep them filled. There really has to be a demand for Ice time to keep it profitable, if there is a shortage of rinks in Buffalo, then there shouldn't be a problem filling ice time outside of prime hours.
The problem with hotels is that the are something thats needed when there is a demand due to an attraction to bring people to the area. You don't build a hotel because you have the occasional hockey tournament once in a while or a one time event. To keep it from struggling, you need something to bring people to the area year round, and thats the one thing Buffalo is lacking right now. Addining more restaurants and Bars to the area isn't going to bring many more people in to the area, there are plenty of dining and drinking establishments in the area for visitors. This could be the start of some good development, but its not going to be something to bring people to the area, thats still whats needed there

#152 Superhero

Superhero

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 45 posts

Posted 29 August 2012 - 06:30 PM

Ted Black said he wants to create somewhere that people would want to come back to over and over again.

They should put a world class luxury/health spa in there.

#153 d4rksabre

d4rksabre

    All Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,969 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 August 2012 - 08:32 PM

View PostSuperhero, on 29 August 2012 - 06:30 PM, said:

Ted Black said he wants to create somewhere that people would want to come back to over and over again.

They should put a world class luxury/health spa in there.

Or a bowling alley.

#154 SwampD

SwampD

    First Liner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,647 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Jersey, orig. NT

Posted 29 August 2012 - 11:34 PM

View Postd4rksabre, on 29 August 2012 - 08:32 PM, said:

Or a bowling alley.
:lol:

#155 deluca67

deluca67

    #67 in your program, #1 in your hearts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,017 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Off Kilter

Posted 30 August 2012 - 07:11 AM

View Postd4rksabre, on 29 August 2012 - 08:32 PM, said:

Or a bowling alley.
They could have the pins painted like Sabres jerseys. At Midnight Bowling they can have a special Tim Connolly pin that shatters on contact and a Ryan Miller pin that when hit it causes the other pins to scatter.

#156 cpabob

cpabob

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 44 posts

Posted 30 August 2012 - 07:18 AM

View PostDeLuca67, on 30 August 2012 - 07:11 AM, said:

They could have the pins painted like Sabres jerseys. At Midnight Bowling they can have a special Tim Connolly pin that shatters on contact and a Ryan Miller pin that when hit it causes the other pins to scatter.

OK, your a giant pain in the *ss most times but that is hilarious. Well done.

#157 TrueBluePhD

TrueBluePhD

    First Liner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,297 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheektowaga, NY

Posted 30 August 2012 - 08:27 AM

View PostDeLuca67, on 30 August 2012 - 07:11 AM, said:

They could have the pins painted like Sabres jerseys. At Midnight Bowling they can have a special Tim Connolly pin that shatters on contact and a Ryan Miller pin that when hit it causes the other pins to scatter.

Out-freakin'-standing :clapping:

#158 Vanek-Man

Vanek-Man

    Dream Big cuz its the Cup

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,173 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 31 August 2012 - 01:22 PM

http://www.thegriffi...19#.UED__5YwWfV

Canisius is planning on playing at one of the rinks. How many people are going to fit in that arena? How much does Canisius even draw?

#159 shrader

shrader

    Enduring tortures, most of which rhyme

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,533 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston, MA

Posted 31 August 2012 - 01:36 PM

View PostVanek-Man, on 31 August 2012 - 01:22 PM, said:

http://www.thegriffi...19#.UED__5YwWfV

Canisius is planning on playing at one of the rinks. How many people are going to fit in that arena? How much does Canisius even draw?

I just scanned through all of their box scores from last year and their peak was 1100.  But that was RIT, so it was a local game.  Other than that, they had one game in the 800s against Mercyhurst (again, relatively local).  The rest seemed to range from 400-700.

#160 Vanek-Man

Vanek-Man

    Dream Big cuz its the Cup

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,173 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 31 August 2012 - 02:08 PM

View Postshrader, on 31 August 2012 - 01:36 PM, said:

I just scanned through all of their box scores from last year and their peak was 1100.  But that was RIT, so it was a local game.  Other than that, they had one game in the 800s against Mercyhurst (again, relatively local).  The rest seemed to range from 400-700.

Thanks. So they'd be a good fit for the Webster rink.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: off topic