#1
Posted 21 June 2012 - 11:32 PM
#2
Posted 21 June 2012 - 11:41 PM
#3
Posted 21 June 2012 - 11:50 PM
#4
Posted 22 June 2012 - 12:26 AM
#5
Posted 22 June 2012 - 12:46 AM
Likely targets Maata at 12, then we'll try to trade up from 21 for Girgensons.
But I really like Kevin Allen's mock: Grigorenko at 12, Slater Koekkoek at 21.
There are so many players I like in the top 20 and quite a few I like who are ranked further down that I see as sleepers.
Unless we reach badly, I figure on going to bed happy with our picks.
#6
Posted 22 June 2012 - 01:09 AM
I am going to Jersey so I wont get to watch the draft, hopefully the Sabres make something happen.
#7
Posted 22 June 2012 - 01:19 AM
inkman, on 22 June 2012 - 12:26 AM, said:
True, but they are just following the MLB who aired their 1st Round out of 30 or so rounds on their Network.
Only the 1st Round is getting any real attention from the media, 2-7 are on NHL Network which is their channel.
#8
Posted 22 June 2012 - 05:44 AM
inkman, on 22 June 2012 - 12:26 AM, said:
Yep.
#9
Posted 22 June 2012 - 05:47 AM
#10
Posted 22 June 2012 - 07:18 AM
At #21 I'd prefer Gaunce, Laughton or Jankowski, but think that if Wilson is there he's who they will pick.
#12
Posted 22 June 2012 - 08:09 AM
DeLuca67, on 22 June 2012 - 05:47 AM, said:
If Darcy said he won't move up because he doesn't like the prospects this year, why would he be content with picking two middle round players?
What will end up Happening is we will trade for some old veteran who can't play anymore and then some 3rd line center from a crappy team and Darcy will try and convince the team that we are better then last year.
When will management realize we need a superstar, not just a team full of 3rd liners and average players? The Bills finally figured this out (see: Mario Williams)
#13
Posted 22 June 2012 - 08:16 AM
inkman, on 22 June 2012 - 12:26 AM, said:
Agreed - I only really watch to see if any trades are being made. That's where the real interest is to me. The rest, as you state, is a crap shoot.
Oh, one more thing - boys, when you are picked in the first round by a team, PLEASE don't spend ten minutes hugging relatives and friends! Hug Dad, kiss Mom and go put on the jersey. You can hug cousin Milo later...
Edited by Sabre Dance, 22 June 2012 - 08:16 AM.
#14
Posted 22 June 2012 - 08:25 AM
OverPowerYou, on 22 June 2012 - 08:09 AM, said:
Devine said something along the lines of there not being consensus top players and the dropoff between 1-20 not being that great this year. So to have to spend both picks to move up to get a guy top 5 who might either be there at #12 or as good as the guy they'll get at #12 doesn't make sense.
Edited by Lanny, 22 June 2012 - 08:30 AM.
#15
Posted 22 June 2012 - 08:39 AM
inkman, on 22 June 2012 - 12:26 AM, said:
I think half the fun of being a fan is pontificating about things you don't know a ton about. The entire NHL season is a crapshoot, yet most people still have opinions on how things will play out and what teams will do this or that, based on information which isn't any better than reading some scouting reports.
DeLuca67, on 22 June 2012 - 05:47 AM, said:
Eleven, on 22 June 2012 - 07:21 AM, said:
I think it depends how things play out. If one of the big names (Staal, Ryan, Nash) get moved for a package that the Sabres could have matched without entirely gutting the organization or a very good 3rd line center gets moved for a middle pick and prospect, then yes, that will be cause for disappointment and/or frustration. On the other hand, I have no interest in trading every valuable asset the Sabres have for a single player. Maybe we can improve the team and still use both first round picks? We do have roster players and NHL-ready prospects to trade. I don't think that would be the worst thing in the world.
#16
Posted 22 June 2012 - 08:52 AM
#17
Posted 22 June 2012 - 08:57 AM
Lanny, on 22 June 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:
It'll break eventually. This draft is not all that promising after Yakupov and Murray (maybe I'm wrong on that, not an expert, but that's what it seems like). Teams will get desperate. Especially because the UFA market isn't awesome either.
#18
Posted 22 June 2012 - 09:03 AM
DeLuca67, on 22 June 2012 - 05:47 AM, said:
Generally, I agree, unless Galchenyuk's injury/Russian blood somehow causes him to fall to #12 and the Sabres take him. Don't see it happening, but you never know. Not crazy about most Russians, but the kid is American born, will play for America internationally, and is (likely) going to be a very good center with a very complete game. After that, there are some players that should be available at #21 that would be nice to have in the system. I'd at least wait until 7/2 before any disappointment started creeping in under that scenario.
#19
Posted 22 June 2012 - 09:11 AM
carpandean, on 22 June 2012 - 09:03 AM, said:
Never knew he was american born. Why do people refer to him as Russian? I get the name thing but I think the chances of this kid bolting to the K.H.L. are slim if he's American. I don't see the risk others have alluded to.
#20
Posted 22 June 2012 - 09:21 AM
bunomatic, on 22 June 2012 - 09:11 AM, said:
Edited by Lanny, 22 June 2012 - 09:23 AM.
#21
Posted 22 June 2012 - 09:26 AM
TrueBluePhD, on 22 June 2012 - 08:39 AM, said:
I think it depends how things play out. If one of the big names (Staal, Ryan, Nash) get moved for a package that the Sabres could have matched without entirely gutting the organization or a very good 3rd line center gets moved for a middle pick and prospect, then yes, that will be cause for disappointment and/or frustration. On the other hand, I have no interest in trading every valuable asset the Sabres have for a single player. Maybe we can improve the team and still use both first round picks? We do have roster players and NHL-ready prospects to trade. I don't think that would be the worst thing in the world.
It will be frustrating if some other team makes a move that the Sabres could have made. It will be disappointing if no move is made, regardless of whether another team makes a move that the Sabres could have made. Not as in "I'm disappointed in Regier," but just disappointed.
#23
Posted 22 June 2012 - 09:36 AM
bunomatic, on 22 June 2012 - 09:11 AM, said:
Not to mentioned he committed to the US international program (could have gone with Russia or US, went with US). I see zero risk in him leaving. Even Grigorenko....Dmitri Chesnokov (Yahoo's Russian hockey writer) said there has been zero interest from KHL teams in making a pitch, nor does he expect there to be. This stuff is oberblown.
Eleven, on 22 June 2012 - 09:26 AM, said:
Got ya, and I mostly agree...but I'll wait to see any particular moves before I decide whether the Sabres should have done it, since I don't necessarily believe any move they can make they should make, if that makes sense.
#24
Posted 22 June 2012 - 09:45 AM
Also they are going to pick Radek Faksa at 12th or move up a little higher just to get him.
By the end of day Mcnabb, Roy, Sekera and possibly Stafford with be gone.
#25
Posted 22 June 2012 - 09:57 AM
sabres13, on 22 June 2012 - 09:45 AM, said:
Also they are going to pick Radek Faksa at 12th or move up a little higher just to get him.
By the end of day Mcnabb, Roy, Sekera and possibly Stafford with be gone.
#26
Posted 22 June 2012 - 09:58 AM
sabres13, on 22 June 2012 - 09:45 AM, said:
Also they are going to pick Radek Faksa at 12th or move up a little higher just to get him.
By the end of day Mcnabb, Roy, Sekera and possibly Stafford with be gone.
Bold and ballsy prediction. I like it. Knowing Darcy, I agree that he won't want to move #12 and is more likely to package #21 with one or more players (Roy + D-man) for a forward with some size. But, who can we realistically get for that price? Personally, I doubt it will be one of the "big" names that are being thrown around (Ryan, Nash, Stasny, etc.).
#27
Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:01 AM
sabres13, on 22 June 2012 - 09:45 AM, said:
Also they are going to pick Radek Faksa at 12th or move up a little higher just to get him.
By the end of day Mcnabb, Roy, Sekera and possibly Stafford with be gone.
Agree to some extent.
I speculate that the 21st and the two 2nd rounders are the picks being dangled.
I don't believe McNabb is going anywhere but the roster this up coming season, but Roy, Sekera, Stafford, yes, I can see them possibly moved.
Also Leopold, and surprisingly to a larger extent, I can see Vanek being dangled for a 1 on 1 trade.
#28
Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:08 AM
#29
Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:21 AM
sabres1970, on 22 June 2012 - 10:08 AM, said:
Kevin Snow also mentioned Darcy is worried about messing with chemistry of the team. Also mentioned how the team looks at pairs of players rather than lines (Vanek Pominville, Stafford Ennis)
#31
Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:38 AM
I actually feel sorry for Darcy. he's been here so long he really is in a no win position.
#32
Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:38 AM
Audio:
http://sabres.nhl.co...id=16&iid=39901
Video:
http://video.sabres....bed-share-video
#33
Posted 22 June 2012 - 10:52 AM
He's working an angle, appears to want to hang on to Foligno, Ennis and Stafford and is waiting until the draft this evening to make a move in my opinion.
#35
Posted 22 June 2012 - 11:10 AM
HopefulFuture, on 22 June 2012 - 10:52 AM, said:
He's working an angle, appears to want to hang on to Foligno, Ennis and Stafford and is waiting until the draft this evening to make a move in my opinion.
#36
Posted 22 June 2012 - 11:15 AM
BMWR100RT, on 22 June 2012 - 10:38 AM, said:
I actually feel sorry for Darcy. he's been here so long he really is in a no win position.
Messing with chemistry is such a broad explanation. It coukd be just ad much about who you bring in as opposed to who goes out. Just try to picture what bringing in a guy like Sean Avery would do to chemistry.
#37
Posted 22 June 2012 - 11:17 AM
DeLuca67, on 22 June 2012 - 05:47 AM, said:
Picking is always a good option.
It really depends who falls to #12 and #21.
Personally, I don't see much movement this draft in terms of trades. I think we'll see more action next week.
#38
Posted 22 June 2012 - 11:23 AM
canada's sportsnet saying Flyers and Columbus in negotiations with Columbus goaltender going to Flyers, deal in works not a done deal yet
#39
Posted 22 June 2012 - 11:32 AM












