GDT: Pittsburgh at Buffalo (3/30/2012, 7:30pm)
#1
Posted 30 March 2012 - 06:37 AM
Washington put the pressure back on the Sabres last night. Time for the Sabres to respond.
#2
Posted 30 March 2012 - 06:42 AM
Edited by zow2, 30 March 2012 - 06:43 AM.
#3
Posted 30 March 2012 - 06:55 AM
Oh well, we need to take care of our own business tonight.
#4
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:08 AM
#5
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:16 AM
#6
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:19 AM
#7
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:27 AM
zow2, on 30 March 2012 - 06:42 AM, said:
I think this is gonna be a tight game, but I think the Sabres are going to have the advantage. If we can get under the Pen's skin early, I think it'll throw them off their game, basically do what we did to Washington. This is a Pen's team that just got swept in a home and home with the Islander's for crying out loud!
#8
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:30 AM
#9
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:37 AM
dEnnis the Menace, on 30 March 2012 - 07:27 AM, said:
I do remember that well. I'm probably thinking more of the Party on the plaza nights like they had earlier this season and early last season.
skondolf, on 30 March 2012 - 06:55 AM, said:
Oh well, we need to take care of our own business tonight.
When Semin scored that shootout goal last night i knew Boston was toast. All Thomas needed was that save,,,argh!
#10
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:54 AM
#11
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:58 AM
I expect to see a pissed desperate Pens club tonight however they did play last night which gives our boys the edge energywise. I watched some of both of the Isles Pens game and the key to beating the Pens is to take away time and space from their skilled players. I believe Bflo was the first to actually show that plan to the rest of the league and accomplished it in our Sunday afternoon win several weeks ago. Same formula applies tonight and with the better rested team and and a solid game from Miller I want the 2 points.
Let's go Buff-a-lo !
#12
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:09 AM
It worked before... so here's another:
See you after the game.
#13
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:14 AM
After winning 11 in a row (!), Pittsburgh has lost 3 of their last 5 (and 4 out of 7).
What often gets lost in the Crosby/Malkin glamor is how physical of a team Pittsburgh is. They play a hard game.
This game will be a real test.
#14
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:16 AM
#15
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:17 AM
#16
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:26 AM
#17
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:29 AM
#18
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:44 AM
#19
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:48 AM
#20
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:57 AM
let. us. go.
#21
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:01 AM
#22
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:26 AM
shrader, on 30 March 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:
Thiessen sent down, Johnson probable starter for tonight....
http://www.post-gaze...unclear-628840/
#24
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:32 AM
Let's Go Buffalo!!!
#25
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:37 AM
I just realized that I won't be watching tonight's game
#26
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:44 AM
apuszczalowski, on 30 March 2012 - 08:26 AM, said:
Maybe Fleury wasn't as "healthy" as they claimed after the hit he took. I finally got a chance to see it, and it looked like he could at least have some whiplash if not a concussion. They're also still missing Letang and Lovejoy, that D is beat up (not that it matters.......
I feel a repeat of the Ranger game last Friday. Big win tonight!
#27
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:47 AM
so, probably no skate, or an optional one.
i am confident that they are staying at the embassy suites on delaware ave. (all of the nhl teams have come to prefer it (maybe other than ott'wa?)).
pre-game nap time is -- what ... at around 2?
sabrespace team ...
#28
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:11 AM
26CornerBlitz, on 30 March 2012 - 09:32 AM, said:
Let's Go Buffalo!!!
#29
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:17 AM
bcardona, on 30 March 2012 - 10:11 AM, said:
10, while he was playing very well overall...had some horrendous turnovers in the last few games....I think 6/52 will be just fine....Sulzer is making good reads and gets the puck out with very good up ice passes most of the time.
#30
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:37 AM
That Aud Smell, on 30 March 2012 - 09:47 AM, said:
so, probably no skate, or an optional one.
i am confident that they are staying at the embassy suites on delaware ave. (all of the nhl teams have come to prefer it (maybe other than ott'wa?)).
pre-game nap time is -- what ... at around 2?
sabrespace team ...

#31
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:45 AM
R_dudly, on 30 March 2012 - 07:58 AM, said:
I expect to see a pissed desperate Pens club tonight however they did play last night which gives our boys the edge energywise. I watched some of both of the Isles Pens game and the key to beating the Pens is to take away time and space from their skilled players. I believe Bflo was the first to actually show that plan to the rest of the league and accomplished it in our Sunday afternoon win several weeks ago. Same formula applies tonight and with the better rested team and and a solid game from Miller I want the 2 points.
Let's go Buff-a-lo !
For sure. The Pens fans in my office have been pretty low key as they have had their fair share of spankings recently. Yesterday one of them predicted they would fall in the first round. A very unpens fan like prediction. The thing that sucks the most is I will have to watch the local Root sports broadcast with Steigy and that windbag Bob Errey.
#32
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:52 AM
The Caps could easily run the table, which would require the Sabres to go at least 4-0-1.
#33
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:52 AM
#34
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:52 AM
Have a #19 jersey? Come to the
Pretty cool stuff!!!
#35
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:58 AM
nfreeman, on 30 March 2012 - 10:52 AM, said:
The Caps could easily run the table, which would require the Sabres to go at least 4-0-1.
#36
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:01 AM
nfreeman, on 30 March 2012 - 10:52 AM, said:
The Caps could easily run the table, which would require the Sabres to go at least 4-0-1.
you're killing me, dude.
#38
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:04 AM
Quote
The bold part just fascinates me!
#39
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:30 AM
dEnnis the Menace, on 30 March 2012 - 11:04 AM, said:
It's probably not as interesting as it seems. In general, the Sabres' record conditional on scoring at least one goal is probably pretty good, and the Sabres' record conditional on scoring at least two goals is probably much better. Add to that the Ennis is not in the top-5 for scoring on the Sabres, so he can be considered secondary scoring for most of that (recent stretch at center, aside), which means that if he scores one, then there's a good chance that they score at least two (and likewise two means most likely three or more), and it's not that surprising. Pick any team that isn't in the cellar, select any player in the 5th-8th in scoring on that team, and you'll probably find a similar record conditional on that player scoring one or two points.
Edited by carpandean, 30 March 2012 - 11:30 AM.
#40
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:31 AM
nfreeman, on 30 March 2012 - 10:52 AM, said:
The Caps could easily run the table, which would require the Sabres to go at least 4-0-1.
Is that assuming the Panthers took the division by that point?












