2012 Trade RUMOR Thread. (Keep the deadline thread for substantiated stuff).
#921
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:35 PM
#922
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:36 PM
Edited by Lanny, 27 February 2012 - 03:36 PM.
#923
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:36 PM
#924
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:37 PM
Edited by tiredsounds, 27 February 2012 - 03:37 PM.
#926
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:39 PM
#927
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:40 PM
And MAG went to VAN also.
#930
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:46 PM
Here's his career stats:
NHL Totals 71 17 18 35 8 12 0 1 1 2 2006-07 Brampton Battalion OHL 63 23 23 46 24 -21 4 1 3 4 0 2007-08 Brampton Battalion OHL 68 40 45 85 36 15 5 5 0 5 2 2008-09 Brampton Battalion OHL 53 43 49 92 33 41 21 11 20 31 18 2008-09 Manitoba Moose AHL -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 2 4 6 4 2009-10 Brampton Battalion OHL 13 8 12 20 9 6 11 3 7 10 4 2010-11 Manitoba Moose AHL 52 17 13 30 14 -12 -- -- -- -- -- 2010-11 Vancouver Canucks NHL 8 1 1 2 0 1 12 0 1 1 2 2011-12 Vancouver Canucks NHL 63 16 17 33 8 8
#931
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:50 PM
nfreeman, on 27 February 2012 - 02:35 PM, said:
Darcy must go.
sabres26, on 27 February 2012 - 02:16 PM, said:
RayFinkle, on 27 February 2012 - 02:10 PM, said:
TrueBluePhD, on 27 February 2012 - 02:29 PM, said:
Edited by PromoTheRobot, 27 February 2012 - 03:50 PM.
#932
Posted 27 February 2012 - 03:53 PM
#936
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:53 PM
https://twitter.com/...108216795086850
and the cut and paste version (not sure how it will come through in terms of formatting):
Mike Harrington
Hey all you Internet rumor-mongers/experts, the
Bob McKenzie Edited by That Aud Smell, 14 May 2012 - 01:53 PM.
#937
Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:44 PM
That Aud Smell, on 14 May 2012 - 01:53 PM, said:
https://twitter.com/...108216795086850
and the cut and paste version (not sure how it will come through in terms of formatting):
Mike Harrington
Hey all you Internet rumor-mongers/experts, the
Bob McKenzie Dear god, Harrington embarrasses himself again. The rumors came from a report by McKenzie himself not Ecklund or some schlub with no credibility. It's nice to see Harrington get a bit of a slap.
#938
Posted 14 May 2012 - 04:12 PM
#939
Posted 14 May 2012 - 04:15 PM
When the Penn St. thing was in full force, everyone from the Sabres refused to talk to the Buff News about anything. Then McKenzie came out with a sweet little ditty about Pegula with no mention of Benson, even as the Sabres were scrubbing his bio.
Not to say Harrington wasn't being snide, but McKenzie has a new lapdog role from where I sit.
#940
Posted 14 May 2012 - 04:34 PM
Ghost of Dwight Drane, on 14 May 2012 - 04:15 PM, said:
When the Penn St. thing was in full force, everyone from the Sabres refused to talk to the Buff News about anything. Then McKenzie came out with a sweet little ditty about Pegula with no mention of Benson, even as the Sabres were scrubbing his bio.
Not to say Harrington wasn't being snide, but McKenzie has a new lapdog role from where I sit.
#943
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:00 PM
d4rksabre, on 14 May 2012 - 05:47 PM, said:
What is wrong with what i said?
1) The Sabres refused to talk to the Buffalo News about Cliff Benson's role on the team or as the Financial Cairman for Jerry Sandusky's charity which was used as a breeding ground for Sandusky to rape young children
2) Pegula or Benson were not made available to local media during the weeks of early investigation into Penn St.
3) The Sabres changed Benson's bio where he was proud to be the Financial Chair for Sandusky
4) McKenzie comes out with an exclusive comment and article from Pegula during this time, with not one mention of any connection of possible key players to his inner circle
These are all FACTS
#944
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:11 PM
Ghost of Dwight Drane, on 14 May 2012 - 06:00 PM, said:
1) The Sabres refused to talk to the Buffalo News about Cliff Benson's role on the team or as the Financial Cairman for Jerry Sandusky's charity which was used as a breeding ground for Sandusky to rape young children
2) Pegula or Benson were not made available to local media during the weeks of early investigation into Penn St.
3) The Sabres changed Benson's bio where he was proud to be the Financial Chair for Sandusky
4) McKenzie comes out with an exclusive comment and article from Pegula during this time, with not one mention of any connection of possible key players to his inner circle
These are all FACTS
Yes and our young Cody is a indian hating indian killing............. no wait that was his father. You just questioned Cody's moral character based on something you implied his father did
#945
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:33 PM
Ghost of Dwight Drane, on 14 May 2012 - 06:00 PM, said:
What is wrong with what i said?
1) The Sabres refused to talk to the Buffalo News about Cliff Benson's role on the team or as the Financial Cairman for Jerry Sandusky's charity which was used as a breeding ground for Sandusky to rape young children
2) Pegula or Benson were not made available to local media during the weeks of early investigation into Penn St.
3) The Sabres changed Benson's bio where he was proud to be the Financial Chair for Sandusky
4) McKenzie comes out with an exclusive comment and article from Pegula during this time, with not one mention of any connection of possible key players to his inner circle
These are all FACTS
Because facts have never been used to support conspiracy theories before.
Bob McKenzie is one of the best, if not THE best reporters in all of hockey. But since he felt like correcting Harrington's little jab at the social media sphere, now he's also a patsy to the Pegula administration.
Your shtick is soooooo tired. Like the elastic in an old pair of tighty whities.
#946
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:46 PM
drnkirishone, on 14 May 2012 - 06:11 PM, said:
First of all, one has nothing to do with the other.
Second of all, I never said anything about Cody Hodgson being a bad person or having anything to do with what his father ordered according to high officials in Canadian government. I was trying to give creedence to the statements that Hodgson's "crew", led by his father, caused more issues for Vancouver than the rest of the team. If you can't connect the two issues, where a controlling person is now a parent of a pro athlete and has been stated as "knowing what is best" for Cody......then that is your perogative. I see it as a red flag and can understand why Vancouver would want to get rid of that headache. Cody Hodgson actually comes across as nice and passive, which will fit right in with the core of the Sabres. He seems to let dad run his life though.
d4rksabre, on 14 May 2012 - 06:33 PM, said:
Bob McKenzie is one of the best, if not THE best reporters in all of hockey. But since he felt like correcting Harrington's little jab at the social media sphere, now he's also a patsy to the Pegula administration.
Your shtick is soooooo tired. Like the elastic in an old pair of tighty whities.
I would have never thought McKenzie to be liek that, but because of the timing and softballness of his article with Pegula, I take anything he says with a grain of salt involving the Sabres now.
It doesn't mean Harrington wasn't spewing BS, or that what McKenzie says about Brown isn't true....it's just that now he has a mark in my opinion and given journalistic boundries, it's sort of a cheap shot given the fact he "scabbed" a fluff piece about Pegula when the Buffalo media was on lockdown.
This added with the fact the Sabres hid from a press conference after the season, and I think I have a clear view forming on how certain higher ups feel about accounting to "the masses".
#947
Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:15 PM
#948
Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:24 PM
drnkirishone, on 14 May 2012 - 11:15 PM, said:
That's usually how it works, but thank you for understanding.
When the Sabres are hoisting a Cup, and Hodgson is one of the first 3 guys to lift it, I will gladly say my concerns were overamplified. So far though, I have only seen a kid with a helicopter parent and his biggest thrill as a Sabre has been to play ministicks in a pink shirt while holding a club soda
#949
Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:30 PM
#950
Posted 15 May 2012 - 07:10 AM
Ghost of Dwight Drane, on 14 May 2012 - 06:46 PM, said:
Second of all, I never said anything about Cody Hodgson being a bad person or having anything to do with what his father ordered according to high officials in Canadian government. I was trying to give creedence to the statements that Hodgson's "crew", led by his father, caused more issues for Vancouver than the rest of the team. If you can't connect the two issues, where a controlling person is now a parent of a pro athlete and has been stated as "knowing what is best" for Cody......then that is your perogative. I see it as a red flag and can understand why Vancouver would want to get rid of that headache. Cody Hodgson actually comes across as nice and passive, which will fit right in with the core of the Sabres. He seems to let dad run his life though.
I would have never thought McKenzie to be liek that, but because of the timing and softballness of his article with Pegula, I take anything he says with a grain of salt involving the Sabres now.
It doesn't mean Harrington wasn't spewing BS, or that what McKenzie says about Brown isn't true....it's just that now he has a mark in my opinion and given journalistic boundries, it's sort of a cheap shot given the fact he "scabbed" a fluff piece about Pegula when the Buffalo media was on lockdown.
This added with the fact the Sabres hid from a press conference after the season, and I think I have a clear view forming on how certain higher ups feel about accounting to "the masses".
Anyway, you did insinuate that Cody was a bad person because of what his father did, accept that fact. You are a conspiracy theorist. Your statements on the Buffalo Sabres org, Cody and McKenzie among others seem to be based it little actual fact and largely taken from 'I heard this!'.
Edited by RazielSabre, 15 May 2012 - 07:10 AM.
#951
Posted 15 May 2012 - 07:40 AM
Ghost of Dwight Drane, on 14 May 2012 - 06:00 PM, said:
or, as tawmy fram fackin' quinzee would put it: NO ONE DENIES THIS!
http://kissingsuzyko...my-from-quinzee
#952
Posted 15 May 2012 - 08:27 AM
But hey, when you haven't reached for some attention in a while, you get bored.
Edited by shrader, 15 May 2012 - 08:27 AM.
#953
Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:48 AM
I also wonder if I should move my Joe Paterno fat head that shows him looking the other way onto the outside of my house instead of the living room. It may help keep trick or treaters away during Halloween time.
#954
Posted 16 May 2012 - 04:02 PM
That Aud Smell, on 14 May 2012 - 01:53 PM, said:
He is really, really insufferable, I'm glad someone else feels the same way. I liked that Joe (@JoeBuffaloWins) called him on his statement as well. Not sure what Harrington's problem is - that bloggers and tweeters (ex. Incarcerated Bob) routinely scoop more conventional reporting sources? Or that bloggers are stepping on the toes of "professionals" who are the only ones legitimately charged to write about the team(s)? He goes out of his way to be smug. Ignoring anything he writes about hockey, his baseball "wisdom" alone leaves plenty to be desired.
Ironic then that he frequents a platform that gives a voice to the people he seems to find most insufferable.
Edited by Double-J, 16 May 2012 - 04:04 PM.












