2012 Trade RUMOR Thread. (Keep the deadline thread for substantiated stuff).
#1
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:19 PM
#5
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:29 PM
#6
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:31 PM
nfreeman, on 14 February 2012 - 01:29 PM, said:
#8
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:40 PM
Sabres Fan In NS, on 14 February 2012 - 01:22 PM, said:
EDIT: I guess not.
Oh look, you're policing the board again.
This thread should heat up nicely in about a week. Unfortunately, almost none of the so called "rumors" will materialize. This is going to be a boring deadline.
#10
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:47 PM
shrader, on 14 February 2012 - 01:40 PM, said:
This thread should heat up nicely in about a week. Unfortunately, almost none of the so called "rumors" will materialize. This is going to be a boring deadline.
Not really ... a tongue in cheek post is not policing.
I think you are probably right about a boring trade deadline. This thread will be more popular than the actual trades thread, particularly from a Sabres stand point, in all likelihood.
BTW. How was New Hampshire? Some people think it is alot like Nova Scotia, without as much ocean front.
#11
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:58 PM
Quote
Was going to put this in Buyers/Sellers thread, but seems like that's been put to rest. Also, I realize the source, but thought worthwhile in response to a much talked about rumor from another site.
Edited by Lanny, 14 February 2012 - 01:59 PM.
#12
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:02 PM
#13
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:08 PM
#14
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:23 PM
#16
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:34 PM
#17
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:36 PM
#18
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:37 PM
#19
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:42 PM
sabres26, on 14 February 2012 - 02:37 PM, said:
It's a nice dream in theory and I would love to get him, but he doesn't want to come here...
#20
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:51 PM
He wants to be on a contender team, i am sure that he wants to play in the playoffs.
There is no reason why he should come to Buffalo.
#21
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:54 PM
Touched by Boyes, on 14 February 2012 - 02:42 PM, said:
It's a nice dream in theory and I would love to get him, but he doesn't want to come here...
Quote
Was thinking something along the lines of Ennis, Stafford, Brennan and a 2nd.
#22
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:57 PM
LaLaLaFontaine, on 14 February 2012 - 02:51 PM, said:
He wants to be on a contender team, i am sure that he wants to play in the playoffs.
There is no reason why he should come to Buffalo.
Lanny, on 14 February 2012 - 02:54 PM, said:
Nash is exactly the type of player you build your team around and is instantly captain and top dog. I just don't want people to get their hopes up since it is the definition of a long shot.
#23
Posted 14 February 2012 - 03:04 PM
Touched by Boyes, on 14 February 2012 - 02:42 PM, said:
It's a nice dream in theory and I would love to get him, but he doesn't want to come here...
Somehow I don't think a decision that big is going to be affected by current standing. He's got a contract through 2018 so I don't think he would be thinking short term. Even though the Sabres are not playing up to par lately doesn't mean there isn't potential and it won't take much to push us to the top. And it's not like Pegula/Black haven't changed their minds about building a Cup contender. Any potential new player can see that the goal is here to become a contender. If Golisano were still the owner it might be a different story. If Nash's main goal is to live someplace more metropolitan then yeah, he might not pick BFLO. But if he wants to go someplace where there is potential I can't see him leaving BFLO off the table. There are some powerhouse teams I'm sure he would consider first, but I don't think he would turn BFLO down just because we're currently in 13th. If he were a free agent at the end of the year I can see him wanting to go someplace just to try and win a Cup this year and then reassess his options during the offseason, but his current contract status would most likely mean he would prefer a team that can and will be successful for the next 6-7 years.
#24
Posted 14 February 2012 - 03:05 PM
#25
Posted 14 February 2012 - 03:19 PM
Can someone post all the top free agents ?
#27
Posted 14 February 2012 - 03:23 PM
JJFIVEOH, on 14 February 2012 - 03:04 PM, said:
To the metropolitan comment, I think him living and being comfortable in Columbus actually helps the arguement for Buffalo. Columbus and Buffalo are pretty similar in city size and style and if he enjoys the smaller type cities that gives us a leg up. I would argue that our fanbase, however, is much stronger and he would get a lot more attention in our city than in Columbus.
#29
Posted 14 February 2012 - 03:34 PM
Touched by Boyes, on 14 February 2012 - 03:23 PM, said:
To the metropolitan comment, I think him living and being comfortable in Columbus actually helps the arguement for Buffalo. Columbus and Buffalo are pretty similar in city size and style and if he enjoys the smaller type cities that gives us a leg up. I would argue that our fanbase, however, is much stronger and he would get a lot more attention in our city than in Columbus.
Yes, every teams goal SHOULD be to build a winner, but there are a few teams who aren't doing a very good job of doing so or are content with being mediocre. As BFLO was for years with Golisano. Perhaps I should have worder my post better. I wasn't implying that some teams don't want to win, it's just that some teams are hitting rock bottom and some teams are barely in the rebuilding phase. Some might disagree, but I think BFLO is just a couple steps from being a contender and don't need to rebuild. With that said, the point of my last post is that Nash would probably rather go to a team that is winning or will be winning in the very near future, and that he might be the one to help push them to that point. I would assume at his age that he might not want to consider a team that is 2-3 years away from winning. Wasn't really implying that some teams don't want to win, haha. Just that he might prefer going somewhere where he doesn't have to keep dealing with losing all the time.
I like your point about him being comfortable in Columbus. If that's the case then yeah, he might like BFLO.
#31
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:06 PM
JJFIVEOH, on 14 February 2012 - 03:34 PM, said:
I like your point about him being comfortable in Columbus. If that's the case then yeah, he might like BFLO.
Who Else?, on 14 February 2012 - 04:00 PM, said:
#32
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:12 PM
#33
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:16 PM
Lanny, on 14 February 2012 - 04:12 PM, said:
#34
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:24 PM
Touched by Boyes, on 14 February 2012 - 04:06 PM, said:
No need to rebuild because of them. Dumping Roy, Stafford and Boyes wouldn't constitute a rebuild.
Edited by JJFIVEOH, 14 February 2012 - 04:24 PM.
#37
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:27 PM
d4rksabre, on 14 February 2012 - 04:24 PM, said:
#38
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:28 PM
Touched by Boyes, on 14 February 2012 - 04:27 PM, said:
I can't see the Rags wanting to give up the future of their team for him though.
#39
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:30 PM
d4rksabre, on 14 February 2012 - 04:28 PM, said:
#40
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:37 PM
The Sabres would obviously have to throw some other good pieces for the deal, but that price could be lowered a bit by taking Steve Mason off their hands. That's a major league reclamation project right there.












